2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of uncertainties and variations in PV modules degradation rates and lifetime predictions using physical models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimated increase in GHG emissions can be mainly attributed to the increase in module temperature as the module temperature shows a significant increase compared to solar irradiation. Moreover, the module temperature has the highest influence on the degradation rates compared to other degradation stress factors [32,33].…”
Section: Assessing the Impact Of Climate Change On The Ghg Emissions ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimated increase in GHG emissions can be mainly attributed to the increase in module temperature as the module temperature shows a significant increase compared to solar irradiation. Moreover, the module temperature has the highest influence on the degradation rates compared to other degradation stress factors [32,33].…”
Section: Assessing the Impact Of Climate Change On The Ghg Emissions ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they focus on PLR itself, not the performance metrics. In [9], the authors try to understand sources of uncertainties in PV degradation rates using physical degradation models. They show that there are three major sources of uncertainties: climate variables estimation, PV modules reliability, and statistical methods for calculating PLRs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies address this issue only partially. Some studies examine performance metrics only in terms of uncertainty [7][8][9][10]. Regarding the statistical methods, some studies try to understand the sources of uncertainties [9] and the impact of missing data [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, irradiation details are more important for yield calculations, while that is not the individual and dominant element [17]. Nonetheless, it is considered for about 50% of the total uncertainty [18,19]. The ground measurements have the highest accuracy of irradiation data for PV models [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%