2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of social sustainable development in urban India by a composite index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Alen et al [28] have used composite indicators to assess national progress and priorities for SD in Australia. Panda et al [29] have used composite indicators for assessing SD in Indian cities. Rahma et al [27] have used composite indicators for assessing SD in Indonesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Alen et al [28] have used composite indicators to assess national progress and priorities for SD in Australia. Panda et al [29] have used composite indicators for assessing SD in Indian cities. Rahma et al [27] have used composite indicators for assessing SD in Indonesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global organizations such as the World Bank, UN-Habitat and Asian Development Bank have taken significant initiatives across different countries to measure sustainability. But these global initiatives have encountered problems in implementing their strategy in India because they have failed to address country specific constraints (Panda, Chakraborty, & Misra, 2016). Hence it is very important to have a tailor made comprehensive sustainability framework to address the problems which are typical to India (Panda, Chakraborty, & Misra, 2016).…”
Section: Absence Of a Tailor-made Nsa Tool Framework In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the regional level analysis, Anand and Roy (2016), Kipp et al (2016), Wullert and Williamson (2016), Mújica et al (2015), Ezeh et al (2015), He et al (2018), Khadka et al (2015), Kennedy et al (2016) Ortiz-Correa et al (2016), Mehretie Adinew et al (2017), Dasgupta et al (2016), Keskin et al (2017), Shih et al (2017), He and Perloff (2016), Wang and Yang (2016), Bhalotra et al (2017) and Sharif (2016) held the same opinion. For India, Duflo et al (2015), Gupta and Mondal (2015), Lakshminarayanan and Jayalakshmy (2015), Parikh et al (2015), Patel et al (2015), Singh et al (2015), Subbaraman and Murthy (2015), Barenberg et al (2016), Bhattacharyya (2016), Gupta et al (2016a), Gupta et al (2016b), Kusneniwar et al (2016); Panda et al (2016), Parker et al (2016), Ranjan (2017), Reddy et al (2017), Do et al (2018) all agreed that better access to improved water sources will lead to lower IMR. For a more detailed consideration of relevant literature one might consider Banerjee et al (2020)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%