2014
DOI: 10.1785/0120140097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Site Effects in Alpine Regions through Systematic Site Characterization of Seismic Stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned by Michel et al (2014), future comparisons of predicted 1D seismic responses with those obtained on earthquake recordings, as well as inclusion of other dispersion features (e.g., polarization, ellipticity, use of Love-wave dispersion curves from passive recordings, use of various ground model parameterization) will definitely help in the constraining of V S profiles and the related uncertainties, to reach robust and very reliable site characterization, and hereafter, better estimates of local site effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned by Michel et al (2014), future comparisons of predicted 1D seismic responses with those obtained on earthquake recordings, as well as inclusion of other dispersion features (e.g., polarization, ellipticity, use of Love-wave dispersion curves from passive recordings, use of various ground model parameterization) will definitely help in the constraining of V S profiles and the related uncertainties, to reach robust and very reliable site characterization, and hereafter, better estimates of local site effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Obviously, these 'uncertainty estimates' were not comparable to one another. However, due to a lack of scientific consensus and any well-established method to quantify the uncertainty of inverted V S profiles Di Giulio et al 2012;Michel et al 2014;Cox and Teague 2016), we finally chose the 'worst' uncertainty estimation. In Table 3, the 'r source' column gives the chosen uncertainty estimates:…”
Section: Inversion and Derivation Of Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant development during PRP and the first phase of the SSMNet upgrade project is the assessment of site-specific broad-band amplification functions with respect to EF13 and the consequent ability to estimation of V S,30 for the majority of the Swiss real-time seismic stations Michel et al 2014). However, at national or regional level, that is for all those sites where a seismic monitoring station is not available, the most reliable and physically sound proxy for amplification phenomena is presently given by mapping changes in the average macroseismic intensity I (Kästli & Fäh 2006; appendix D-1 of Fäh et al 2011) with respect to the mean values of the Swiss intensity prediction equation (IPE) of Fäh et al (2011).…”
Section: S I T E E F F E C T Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fäh et al 2011;Poggi et al 2011;. In-parallel to PRP, the first phase of the upgrade project of the Swiss strong-motion network (SSMNet; Clinton et al 2011;) improved the quality and quantity of the strong motion data being recorded across the nation and also included detailed geophysical characterization at a majority of new and existing Swiss strong-motion stations Michel et al 2014).…”
Section: Introduction a N D M O T I Vat I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%