2021
DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i58b34214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Oral Health Care Needs among Fishermen Living in North Chennai, India – A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract: Introduction: Studies conducted among fishermen shows that there was a high prevalence rate in Oral mucosal lesions. However, data on oral health care needs among fisherman is scarce. Hence this was undertaken to obtain a data that can be used to plan programmes for the prevention and treatment of such oral mucosal lesions in the fishermen. Materials and Methods: A study was carried out among 71 fishermen after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethical committee and concerned authorities. A self… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study did not mention the studied population [ 39 ]. Two studies investigated oral cancer among seafarers and fishermen [ 70 , 71 ] and five studies about potential malignant disorders [ 12 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 72 ]. Four studies described the emergency related to oral diseases cases and oral injury in maritime settings [ 36 38 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One study did not mention the studied population [ 39 ]. Two studies investigated oral cancer among seafarers and fishermen [ 70 , 71 ] and five studies about potential malignant disorders [ 12 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 72 ]. Four studies described the emergency related to oral diseases cases and oral injury in maritime settings [ 36 38 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, out of 22 included observational studies, 16 studies were rated as high quality [ 12 , 20 , 36 , 38 , 59 , 61 68 , 70 72 ], 5 studies had moderate quality [ 11 , 35 , 37 , 60 , 69 ] and only one study was rated as low quality due to not presenting data and weak methodological design [ 39 ] ( S2 Appendix ). When assessing the quality of RCT by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, the overall risk-of-bias judgement of both studies were to have some concern on risk of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations