2015
DOI: 10.17665/1676-4285.20155120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of nutritional status in comparison to neuropsychomotor development in children: a descriptive study

Abstract: Objetivo: avaliar o estado nutricional relacionando ao desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor de crianças. Método: pesquisa descritiva, de natureza quantitativa, desenvolvida em um centro de educação infantil da região norte do município de São Paulo. A amostra foi constituída por 82 crianças de um a quatro anos de idade. As informações obtidas foram analisadas de maneira descritiva, calculando-se as frequências absolutas e relativas para as variáveis quantitativas. Resultados: a maioria das crianças era do sexo masc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was significant and positive relationship between iron intake and both total and non-verbal IQ (Arija et al, 2006). The development of children may be influenced by their nutritional status, and obesity may pose risks in gross motor performance terms (Onofre et al, 2017). Children who are overweight or obese may have perceptual-motor coordination issues that influence not an only gross motor, but fine motor skills as well (Hondt et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was significant and positive relationship between iron intake and both total and non-verbal IQ (Arija et al, 2006). The development of children may be influenced by their nutritional status, and obesity may pose risks in gross motor performance terms (Onofre et al, 2017). Children who are overweight or obese may have perceptual-motor coordination issues that influence not an only gross motor, but fine motor skills as well (Hondt et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%