2017
DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of inhibitory control in crack and/or cocaine users: a systematic review

Abstract: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Review ArticleResumo Objetivo: Prejuízos envolvendo o controle inibitório têm sido considerados déficits centrais em usuários de substâncias psicoativas, contudo parece haver disfunções específicas de acordo com a droga de escolha. Este artigo teve por objetivo revisar os achados recentes sobre alterações do controle inibitório em amostras de usuários de cocaína e/ou crack. Método: A pesquisa foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, PsycINFO e Web of Knowledge, em duas et… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, relapses to the use of crack-cocaine after subjects had been discharged from the hospital were very similar between groups in the first 30 days and almost similar after 60 days. A high proportion from both, the sham-tDCS and real tDCS groups (41.7 and 41.2, respectively) relapsed in the first 30 days after intervention, and a higher proportion of subjects relapsed in both groups up to 60 days after intervention, 66.7% in the sham-tDCS group and 52.9% in the real tDCS group, which, unfortunately, are usually seen in this DUD ( Dias et al, 2011 ; Czermainski et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, relapses to the use of crack-cocaine after subjects had been discharged from the hospital were very similar between groups in the first 30 days and almost similar after 60 days. A high proportion from both, the sham-tDCS and real tDCS groups (41.7 and 41.2, respectively) relapsed in the first 30 days after intervention, and a higher proportion of subjects relapsed in both groups up to 60 days after intervention, 66.7% in the sham-tDCS group and 52.9% in the real tDCS group, which, unfortunately, are usually seen in this DUD ( Dias et al, 2011 ; Czermainski et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The annual prevalence rate of cocaine use (defined as the number of people aged 15-64 years who have consumed the drug at least once during the last 12 months) is 0.35 worldwide with important regional differences between North America (1.77), Oceania (1.54), Western and Central Europe (1.08) and Asia (0.04) (Peacock et al, 2018). When compared to controls with no history of substance abuse, cocaine and/or crack users exhibited higher levels of impulsiveness (for review Czermainski et al, 2017). In addition, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and substance use disorders often coexist in adults, the risk of developing cocaine abuse is two times higher in individuals with (vs. without) ADHD; the prevalence of ADHD is also high among patients with cocaine dependence (20-25%) (for review Miguel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Déficits relacionados ao controle inibitório de usuários de cocaína e crack foram identificados em uma revisão sistemática da literatura, que aponta níveis elevados de impulsividade, contribuindo para que essa população experimente insuficiência na autorregulação e autocontrole (Czermainski, Willhelm, Santos, Pachado & Almeida, 2017). Especificamente em usuários de crack, as disfunções nas habilidades anteriormente citadas que agem como funções executivas, dificultam o processamento cognitivo no planejamento e na execução de metas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Considerando a impulsividade relacionada ao uso de crack (Hess, Menezes, & Almeida, 2017), a presença de prejuízos no autocontrole da agressividade em usuários de crack (Almeida, Flores & Scheffer, 2013;Czermainski, Willhelm, Santos, Pachado & Almeida, 2017) e a carência de estudos específicos com mulheres usuárias de crack (Limberger, Nascimento, Schneider, & Andretta, 2015), há necessidade de evidências que expliquem quais fatores contribuem para as dificuldades no autocontrole da agressividade de mulheres usuárias de crack, a fim de promover o avanço na área e maior atenção dos profissionais da saúde e das políticas públicas (Limberger, Schneider, & Andretta, 2015). Sendo assim, objetiva-se identificar o valor preditivo de comorbidades psiquiátricas, contextos de interação e situações relacionadas ao uso de drogas no autocontrole da agressividade de usuárias de crack.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified