2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of geometric features for individual identification and verification in biometric hand systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best EER reported in other approaches is 0.55% for 2D Palm-print + 2D hand geometry + Finger texture (Kanhangad et al, 2011a), whereas our best EER is 0.31% over our JUET dataset. Using GA-LDA, 4.51% EER is reported in (Luque-Baena et al, 2013) and using 80 features of fingers 2.3% of EER are reported in (De-Santos-Sierra et al, 2011) over IITD dataset whereas proposed method is able to gain 0.52% EER over same dataset using hand shape and geometry features (i.e. total 121 features).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best EER reported in other approaches is 0.55% for 2D Palm-print + 2D hand geometry + Finger texture (Kanhangad et al, 2011a), whereas our best EER is 0.31% over our JUET dataset. Using GA-LDA, 4.51% EER is reported in (Luque-Baena et al, 2013) and using 80 features of fingers 2.3% of EER are reported in (De-Santos-Sierra et al, 2011) over IITD dataset whereas proposed method is able to gain 0.52% EER over same dataset using hand shape and geometry features (i.e. total 121 features).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In contrast to this method, we have utilized the advantages of the shape of hands also which have proved to be a crucial feature along with the geometrical features. Luque-Baena, Elizondo, López-Rubio, Palomo, and Watson (2013) have analyzed the reliability of geometric features of hand and extracted total 403 features. They used combination of Genetic algorithm (GA) and Local discriminative analysis (LDA) and finally produced 35 features.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this method is the relatively higher efficiency, and the drawback is the lower accuracy. Arroyo and Fernandez [13] improved the meanvariance assessment method, and proposed the K-means fuzzy assessment method that improved the accuracy of mean-variance assessment method; Luque-Baena et al [14] also proposed the fuzzy assessment method based on K-means and used it to evaluate the robot behavior. Support-confidence method is the one assessing system behavior by the concept of support and confidence, and this method is usually combined with the research of data mining [7,8,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Guo et al [24] have proposed a contact free identification system based on hand geometry using 34 hand geometrical features and have reached 96.23% of correct identification rate. Whereas, Luque-Baena et al [13] have utilized initially 403 geometrical measurements of the hand in their contactless hand verification system and selected later pertinent features using Genetic Algorithms (GA) feature selection method. This system reported an equal error rate of 4.51 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%