2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of experimental thermal, numerical, and mandibular drilling factors in implantology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have reported no significant difference in bone repair with use of different drilling speeds (Ribeiro Junior et al 2007). Other investigations have shown a reduction of frictional heat arising from bone drilling when low rotational speed is used (Pirjamalineisiani et al 2015). In contrast, Iyer et al (1997) stated that the rate and quality of healing are better around osteotomies prepared at high speed rather than around osteotomies performed at intermediate or low speeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors have reported no significant difference in bone repair with use of different drilling speeds (Ribeiro Junior et al 2007). Other investigations have shown a reduction of frictional heat arising from bone drilling when low rotational speed is used (Pirjamalineisiani et al 2015). In contrast, Iyer et al (1997) stated that the rate and quality of healing are better around osteotomies prepared at high speed rather than around osteotomies performed at intermediate or low speeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other investigations have shown a reduction of frictional heat arising from bone drilling when low rotational speed is used (Pirjamalineisiani et al. ). In contrast, Iyer et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, two drill bits with a diameter of 4 mm and materials of WC and NT were modeled and then the same drill with a diameter of 6 mm and materials of WC and NT modeling 3D. Material characteristics of drill bits and bone are presented in Table 1 [36, 37]. In each of four modes, drill bit models, calcified plaque and artery for meshing and FEM analysis were transferred to ABAQUS software Version 6.14 (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…88,167,175,176 Others discovered a significant influence of point angle on bone damage, but the findings are contradictory. For example, the first group unveiled that a larger point angle increases bone temperature 10,21,102,115,123,147,162,167,175,176 and force. 10,21,68,167,174,189 Contrastingly, others found a decrease in heat generation, 5,13,40,133 force, 133 and torque 68,174 with point angle.…”
Section: Point Anglementioning
confidence: 99%