2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/educon.2013.6530266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of engineering professional skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of engineering programs have applied descriptive rubrics to assessing a wide range of ABET outcomes, including professional skills [15], ethics [16], writing skills [13], and design competency [17], [18]. From a practical perspective, descriptive rubrics are appealing because they can be tuned to target specific skills and describe precisely the expected outcome, such as in the work of Coso and Pritchett [19], who developed a rubric to specifically encourage and assess student consideration of stakeholders in design decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of engineering programs have applied descriptive rubrics to assessing a wide range of ABET outcomes, including professional skills [15], ethics [16], writing skills [13], and design competency [17], [18]. From a practical perspective, descriptive rubrics are appealing because they can be tuned to target specific skills and describe precisely the expected outcome, such as in the work of Coso and Pritchett [19], who developed a rubric to specifically encourage and assess student consideration of stakeholders in design decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In engineering education, scoring rubrics have been used in the performance evaluation of a wide range of ABET and other outcomes, including professional skills [10], ethics [11], writing skills [12], design competency [13,14], and students' software skills [15]. The motivation to use scoring rubrics in engineering education also is due to the lack of satisfaction emanating from the use of the traditional grading process which have been criticized for their bias, and unrealistic standards [2,9,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%