Dr. Beyerlein is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho where he has taught for 27 years. He is involved in course design, course delivery, assessment of student learning, and pedagogical studies related to solid modeling, senior design, lean manufacturing, and thermodynamics. For the past four years he has participated in a multi-institution team investigating best practices for professional skill assessment with EPSA materials. This has involved scenario creation, administration in mid-program as well as end-of-program design courses, and preparation of materials for rater training.Dr. Patrick D. Pedrow P.E., Washington State University Patrick D. Pedrow received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Idaho, Moscow, in 1975, the Master of Engineering degree in electric power engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, in 1976, the M.S. degree in physics from Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, in 1981, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, in 1985. From 1976 to 1981
IntroductionThis paper presents the results of implementing the Engineering Professional Skills Assessment (EPSA) method within the 'ethics' section of a senior level "Professional Issues" course. During the two years that the course instructors have been using the EPSA method, they have found the interdisciplinary EPSA scenarios to generate more enthusiastic and higher level discussion than case studies that focus solely on ethics. This paper describes the use of the different EPSA scenarios, the standardized questions which are used to prompt the student discussion, the EPSA rubric, the EPSA Summary Score, the facilitation plan, and also describes how the EPSA method can be incorporated for use at both the classroom and program level. All material described in the paper is included in the paper's appendices.
BackgroundEngineering programs often contain a senior level "Professional Issues" course to cover topics, such as ethics, which are related to the professional practice of engineering. These courses commonly utilize case studies focusing on ethics as the basis for student discussions. 1 Measuring the student learning resulting from the case study process is often very subjective, difficult to quantify, inconsistent between evaluators, and costly to administer.2,3 Determining changes in student learning from freshman to senior year is also different to quantify.Proficiency in engineering professional skills, such as ethics, as described in ABET criterion 3 -student outcomes 4 , is critical for success in the multidisciplinary, intercultural team interactions that characterize 21st century engineering careers. These professional skills may be effectively assessed using a performance assessment that consists of three components: (1) a task that elicits the performance; (2) the performance itself (which is the event or artifact to be assessed); and (3) a criterion-referenced instrument, such as a rubric, to measure the quality o...