1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01168.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of chewing efficiency: a comparison of particle size distribution determined using optical scanning and sieving of almonds

Abstract: Particle sizes obtained with progressive chewing cycles were quantified by use of an optical scanning device and compared with the sieving method. The aim of this study was to validate the optical method by comparison with sieving using a natural test food, almond. Masticatory efficiency was assessed in six dentate subjects. The almonds were chewed for 1, 4, 8, 16 and 32 chewing strokes. Each experiment was replicated. The chewed material was sieved through a 1 mm aperture sieve on a Buchner funnel and dried a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical scanning method however, would be an advantage for studying the characteristic of the chewed particles, the fracture behaviour of the test food or when using coloured particles. Nevertheless, both methods gave a satisfactory measure of masticatory efficiency but skills were needed to use the optical scanning method (59).…”
Section: Comparison Between Optical Scanning and Sievingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical scanning method however, would be an advantage for studying the characteristic of the chewed particles, the fracture behaviour of the test food or when using coloured particles. Nevertheless, both methods gave a satisfactory measure of masticatory efficiency but skills were needed to use the optical scanning method (59).…”
Section: Comparison Between Optical Scanning and Sievingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from carrot, coffee beans (40,66), almond (42,46,55,56,59), peanuts (67,68), soya beans (13,19), boiled white egg, apple, bread, shredded coconut, meat, cracked corn, raisins (17), and cylindrical coconut (41) have all been used.…”
Section: Natural Test Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, other methods such as laser diffraction, microscopy, sedimentation analysis, and diffusion of light have been introduced [8,21,22]. Image analysis is another method used to characterize the shape of the bolus particles [2,3,6,7,22,23]. This method was used in this experiment to determine whether the size and shape properties of a ready-to-swallow food bolus were independent of the subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,11,21 Nevertheless, the accuracy and specificity of an optical system, in which the projected dimensions of the comminuted food particles can be measured, is accompanied by an increase in speed over the conventional method. 17 Several factors influence masticatory performance, including severity of the malocclusion, 3 occlusal contact area and body size, 11,21 number of functional tooth units and bite force. 5,9 The areas of contact between occluding teeth determine the area available for shearing food during chewing cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%