Particle sizes obtained with progressive chewing cycles were quantified by use of an optical scanning device and compared with the sieving method. The aim of this study was to validate the optical method by comparison with sieving using a natural test food, almond. Masticatory efficiency was assessed in six dentate subjects. The almonds were chewed for 1, 4, 8, 16 and 32 chewing strokes. Each experiment was replicated. The chewed material was sieved through a 1 mm aperture sieve on a Buchner funnel and dried after washing with water and 100% alcohol. The dried particles were weighed and scanned by an optical scanning device for number and size. The same samples were sieved and weighed with a conventional sieve method. The results of both methods were described by particle size distributions based on the volume of particles. The results derived from the optical scanning and sieving showed similarity. It can be concluded that the optical method is simple to use, faster than sieving and needs little skill in the use of equipment. The comparison of the results validates both methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.