2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-022-04286-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and characterization of the monthly probabilities of rainfall in Midwest Brazil using different goodness-of-fit tests as probability density functions selection criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probability density functions (PDF) were used to obtain the maximum monthly probable rainfall, associated with the return periods of 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 years, before and after the breaking point in the time series. The PDFs used were Gumbel, 3‐parameters log‐normal and gamma (Abreu et al, 2023; Lima et al, 2021). PDFs were used after the suitable fit hypothesis obtained from the goodness‐of‐fit test of Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) (Abreu et al, 2022a; Masingi & Maposa, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probability density functions (PDF) were used to obtain the maximum monthly probable rainfall, associated with the return periods of 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 years, before and after the breaking point in the time series. The PDFs used were Gumbel, 3‐parameters log‐normal and gamma (Abreu et al, 2023; Lima et al, 2021). PDFs were used after the suitable fit hypothesis obtained from the goodness‐of‐fit test of Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) (Abreu et al, 2022a; Masingi & Maposa, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the GEVD with respect to other distributions in the present investigation is justified because said distribution is the one that presents the most adequate adjustments and optimal statistical performances for the analysis of maximum rainfall extremes and their corresponding return periods, especially for rainy and seasonal periods, as indicated by research by Campos-Aranda (2018), Min & Halim (2020), Hossain et al (2021), Mohamed & Adam (2022) and Abreu et al (2023). Likewise, its location, scale, and shape parameters are better related to the climatic variables altitude and average rainfall, compared to other indicators of other distributions, which later helps to differentiate areas of greater or lesser rainfall, as well as its intensity, these results are in agreement with the findings of Campos-Aranda (2019) for Mexico, Guillén-Oviedo et al (2020) for Costa Rica, Mashishi et al (2020) for South Africa, Back & Bonfante (2021) for Brazil, Klassou & Komi (2021) for West Africa, Wang & Xuan (2021) for England and Australia, and Ulrich et al (2021) for Germany.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…adherence of the Gumbel distribution to the data under investigation, the Anderson-Darling (AD) test was used at a signi cance level of α = 0.05. The nonparametric Anderson-Darling test seeks to weight more strongly the tails of the distributions and is an alternative to tests that have their power decreased in the tails(Naghettini and Pinto 2007;Abreu et al 2023). Thus, it includes the probability distributions included in the asymptotic extreme value theory, such as the Gumbel distribution Back and Cadorin (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%