2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
87
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
12
87
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…- ------------------------------- ---------------------------------We proceeded to assess the differences between the path coefficients of the structural models of the two groups using Henseler, Ringle, and Sinkovics (2009) boot-strap-based MGA, which has been recently established as the most conservative MGA method for PLS-SEM (Rasoolimanesh et al, 2017;Schlägel & Sarstedt, 2016). The results (refer to Table 5) showed that Saudi and foreign employees significantly differ on the path from SKH → distrust (H2), as the coefficient was significantly stronger for foreigners (0.598***) than for Saudis (0.432***).…”
Section: Multigroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- ------------------------------- ---------------------------------We proceeded to assess the differences between the path coefficients of the structural models of the two groups using Henseler, Ringle, and Sinkovics (2009) boot-strap-based MGA, which has been recently established as the most conservative MGA method for PLS-SEM (Rasoolimanesh et al, 2017;Schlägel & Sarstedt, 2016). The results (refer to Table 5) showed that Saudi and foreign employees significantly differ on the path from SKH → distrust (H2), as the coefficient was significantly stronger for foreigners (0.598***) than for Saudis (0.432***).…”
Section: Multigroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step is to examine the configuration invariance, which implies checking that identical indicators have been used in both groups, as well as an identical data treatment and identical configuration of the algorithm [51]. The second step is to check the invariance of the composition, which occurs when composite scores are created equally across groups [180]. Finally, the third step is to check the invariance of means and variances.…”
Section: Multigroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we need further research that demonstrates incremental predictive validity of both the overall construct over other constructs and of sub-dimensions of the construct for different areas (e.g., Richter et al, 2019; see also Matsumoto and Hwang, 2013). Fourth, researchers need to further test the statistical properties, such as measurement equivalence, discriminant validity of sub-dimensions of CQ, and of CQ in contrast to sub-dimensions of GM or CC (e.g., Bücker et al, 2016;Schlägel and Sarstedt, 2016).…”
Section: Trace Thought Through Time and Space: Use Bibliometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%