1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(99)00011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effects of assortment and ambience: a choice experimental approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, consumers often expect more choice, and producers are eager to oblige. By extension, choice provides a criterion for competition among vendors (Koelemeijer and Oppewal 1999). Moreover, not only humans but also animals prefer to have more than fewer choices (Catania 1975;Suzuki 1999;Voss and Homzie 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, consumers often expect more choice, and producers are eager to oblige. By extension, choice provides a criterion for competition among vendors (Koelemeijer and Oppewal 1999). Moreover, not only humans but also animals prefer to have more than fewer choices (Catania 1975;Suzuki 1999;Voss and Homzie 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, large assortments can have advantages, as a large variety of choices increases the likelihood of satisfying diverse consumers and thus caters to individuality and pluralism (Anderson 2006). Accordingly, retailers in the marketplace who offer more choice seem to have a competitive advantage over those who offer less (Arnold, Oum, and Tigert 1983;Bown, Read, and Summers 2003;Craig, Ghosh, and McLafferty 1984;Koelemeijer and Oppewal 1999;Oppewal and Koelemeijer 2005). Second, if negative effects of too much choice are robust and generalizable, one might think that retailers could increase sales by offering less variety.…”
Section: Arguments Against the Choice Overload Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retailers relationship efforts are defined as ''any effort that is actively made by a retailer towards a consumer, that is intended to contribute to the consumer's perceived value above and beyond the core product and/or service efforts received, and that can only be perceived by the consumer after continued exchange with the retailer''. Hutheson and Muthinho [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] found that shoppers used a combination of quality of staff and the occurrence of low prices as the main variables in choosing a store. Salesperson can be seen as the extension of the store image and can play a significant role for repeat purchase and increasing satisfaction.…”
Section: Retailers Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%