Abstract:B ackground: Self-determination theory (SDT) has increasingly been used as a theoretical framework for evaluating key elements of the recovery paradigm in rehabilitation and mental health services research and policy-making for people living with severe mental illnesses. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Behavioral Regulation in Work Questionnaire (BRWQ), an adaptation of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2, as a measure of self-determined work motivation for use in psych… Show more
“…Articles describing program level outcomes such as Clubhouse costs and did not offer data on the outcomes of interest described above (Daniilidis 2014 ; Fitzgerald 2013; Fitzgerald et al 2015a , b ; Labun et al 2012 ; Lesley and Livingood 2015 ; McKay et al 2007 ; Plotnick and Salzer 2008 ; Pernice-Duca et al 2015 , 2010 ; Tanaka 2013 ; Tanaka et al 2015 ; Tanaka and Davidson 2015 ; Torres Stone et al 2015 ).…”
The Clubhouse Model has been in existence for over sixty-five years; however, a review that synthesizes the literature on the model is needed. The current study makes use of the existing research to conduct a systematic review of articles providing a comprehensive understanding of what is known about the Clubhouse Model, to identify the best evidence available, as well as areas that would benefit from further study. Findings are summarized and evidence is classified by outcome domains. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT’s), quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies for domains of employment (N = 29); quality of life/satisfaction (N = 10); reductions in psychiatric hospitalization(s) (N = 10); social relationships (N = 10); education (N = 3); and health promotion activities (N = 2). RCT results support the efficacy of the Clubhouse Model in promoting employment, reducing hospitalization(s), and improving quality of life. Quasi-experimental and observational studies offer support in education and social domains. The findings from this review indicate that Clubhouses are a promising practice but additional studies using rigorous methods that report the strength of the outcomes are needed to evaluate Clubhouse programs with fidelity to the Clubhouse Model.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…Articles describing program level outcomes such as Clubhouse costs and did not offer data on the outcomes of interest described above (Daniilidis 2014 ; Fitzgerald 2013; Fitzgerald et al 2015a , b ; Labun et al 2012 ; Lesley and Livingood 2015 ; McKay et al 2007 ; Plotnick and Salzer 2008 ; Pernice-Duca et al 2015 , 2010 ; Tanaka 2013 ; Tanaka et al 2015 ; Tanaka and Davidson 2015 ; Torres Stone et al 2015 ).…”
The Clubhouse Model has been in existence for over sixty-five years; however, a review that synthesizes the literature on the model is needed. The current study makes use of the existing research to conduct a systematic review of articles providing a comprehensive understanding of what is known about the Clubhouse Model, to identify the best evidence available, as well as areas that would benefit from further study. Findings are summarized and evidence is classified by outcome domains. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT’s), quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies for domains of employment (N = 29); quality of life/satisfaction (N = 10); reductions in psychiatric hospitalization(s) (N = 10); social relationships (N = 10); education (N = 3); and health promotion activities (N = 2). RCT results support the efficacy of the Clubhouse Model in promoting employment, reducing hospitalization(s), and improving quality of life. Quasi-experimental and observational studies offer support in education and social domains. The findings from this review indicate that Clubhouses are a promising practice but additional studies using rigorous methods that report the strength of the outcomes are needed to evaluate Clubhouse programs with fidelity to the Clubhouse Model.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…The Behavioral Regulation in Work Questionnaire has been validated in a sample of individuals with severe mental illness. It was found to have good factorial validity, and the internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from acceptable to good (Fitzgerald et al, 2015). The autonomous motivation subscale had a Cronbach's alpha of .75 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Autonomous motivation. Autonomous motivation was assessed with the Behavioral Regulation in Work Questionnaire (Fitzgerald et al, 2015). The self-report questionnaire was developed by modifying the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (Markland & Tobin, 2004) to change the referent from "exercise" to "work" and is the only measure available that assesses autonomy to work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tansey et al (2017) showed that within their integrated self-determination model of work motivation (i.e., autonomous motivation, competency, outcome expectancy, and VR engagement), working alliance played the most prominent role in optimizing the stages of change for employment of adults with disabilities either directly or indirectly through other self-determination-and self-efficacy-related variables. A study by Fitzgerald et al (2015) indicated that self-determination components appeared to be interconnected with desire to work and goal persistence in a sample of individuals with severe mental illness. In a study by Kennedy, Goggin, and Nollen (2004), rehabilitation adherence was positively influenced by autonomous motivation and negatively associated with controlled motivation.…”
The purpose of this study was to draw from self-determination and self-efficacy theories to evaluate psychological constructs (autonomous motivation, competency, and outcome expectancy) as mediators of the relationship between working alliance and engagement in transition–vocational rehabilitation (VR) services among African American students with disabilities. A serial multiple mediation analysis was computed to evaluate the mediators of transition-VR service engagement in a sample of 88 African American high school students with disabilities. We found that working alliance was positively associated with active engagement in transition-VR services (total effect), whereas the direct effect of working alliance on engagement was not significant after controlling for the effects of autonomous motivation, competency, and outcome expectancy, supporting significant mediation effects. Findings suggest that a strong working alliance between students and rehabilitation counselors and transition specialists can foster autonomous motivation, competency, and outcome expectancy, resulting in higher levels of engagement in transition-VR services.
“…VR agencies may facilitate engagement by emphasizing collaboration between clients and counselors that is rooted in self-determination principles (Chan et al, 1997; Tansey et al, 2017). Self-determination represents a change from the “shoulds” to “decisions and behaviors” as the best options for helping people with disabilities in achieving rehabilitation and goals (Corrigan et al, 2012; Fitzgerald et al, 2015). Application of self-determination principles may foster greater client engagement, leading to more successful employment outcomes.…”
Although gainful employment is associated with health and well-being, people with chronic illness and disability may be ambivalent about the prospects of working. As a result, those who might benefit from vocational rehabilitation (VR) services do not always fully engage in those services. Limited motivation toward participating may be due to factors related to self-determination and autonomous choice. Rehabilitation counseling researchers are beginning to test Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory (SDT), along with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory (SET), as a work motivation model in VR. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate SDT and SET constructs as predictors of VR engagement in a sample of VR clients, using hierarchical regression analysis. After controlling for the effects of demographic variables and person–environment (P-E) contextual factors, SDT and SET predictors were found to account for an increase of 40% in the variance explained in VR engagement. Working alliance was the single strongest predictor of VR engagement, followed by job performance self-efficacy and autonomy supportive climate. Interventions to enhance counselor skills to promote working alliance, in addition to vocational training to increase job performance self-efficacy of rehabilitation clients, may strengthen motivation to engage in VR services, leading to better employment outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.