2017
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2016.2582513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Route Choice to Mitigate Older Driver Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Navigation systems can be adapted to enable pre-trip planning features suited for older drivers by providing choice of low traffic routes, routes with fewer turns, optimal time of departure to avoid hazardous driving situations such as traffic congestion and poor weather conditions, routes that are familiar, avoid routes with tolls, highways, construction zones, and routes with no GVM restrictions. Payyanadan, Sanchez, and Lee [47] showed that there is opportunity to improve the driving safety outcomes of older drivers in urban and rural settings by providing them with alternate routes that reduce their exposure to left turns, U-turns, construction zones, and lane closures. Current DSS are not equipped with retrospective feedback features to provide post-drive feedback that can remind older drivers of the route driven and their driving behavior, challenges experienced along a driven route such as getting lost or missing a turn, and opportunities to improve driving safety outcomes by selecting alternate routes with fewer challenges.…”
Section: Can Driver Support Systems Help Address Older Driver Chalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Navigation systems can be adapted to enable pre-trip planning features suited for older drivers by providing choice of low traffic routes, routes with fewer turns, optimal time of departure to avoid hazardous driving situations such as traffic congestion and poor weather conditions, routes that are familiar, avoid routes with tolls, highways, construction zones, and routes with no GVM restrictions. Payyanadan, Sanchez, and Lee [47] showed that there is opportunity to improve the driving safety outcomes of older drivers in urban and rural settings by providing them with alternate routes that reduce their exposure to left turns, U-turns, construction zones, and lane closures. Current DSS are not equipped with retrospective feedback features to provide post-drive feedback that can remind older drivers of the route driven and their driving behavior, challenges experienced along a driven route such as getting lost or missing a turn, and opportunities to improve driving safety outcomes by selecting alternate routes with fewer challenges.…”
Section: Can Driver Support Systems Help Address Older Driver Chalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation stems from the benefit of social interactions surfacing attitudes, and explanations that individual interviews and observations may not reveal, and so represents a tradeoff associated with methods used to understand driver behavior. Such tradeoffs should be addressed with future work to further our understanding of the challenges of older drivers using naturalistic driving data, which provides an objective representation of the driving challenges faced by older drivers in urban, suburban, and rural settings [47].…”
Section: Can Driver Support Systems Help Address Older Driver Chalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karim and Sayed [24] established the shortest path model integrating travel time and safety by analyzing the relationship between traffic conflict and collision. Payyanadan et al [25] used the collision accident data of elderly drivers to quantify accident risk influencing factors, such as left turn, U-turn, and travel distance. ey evaluated the safety of the path on this basis to help elderly drivers choose a safer route and reduce their accident risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of route choice, Payyanadan et al (2017a) [28] developed a route risk measure, and quantified the risk of driving challenges using older driver crash statistics. Results showed that the low-risk alternative reduced risk for 77.7% of the older drivers' trips on average by 61.4%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%