2010
DOI: 10.1071/wf08132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies

Abstract: To control and use wildland fires safely and effectively depends on creditable assessments of fire potential, including the propensity for crowning in conifer forests. Simulation studies that use certain fire modelling systems (i.e. NEXUS, FlamMap, FARSITE, FFE-FVS (Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator), Fuel Management Analyst (FMAPlus®), BehavePlus) based on separate implementations or direct integration of Rothermel’s surface and crown rate of fire spread models with Van Wagner’s crow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
156
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even an immediate doubling of fire rates due to climate change or other factors would result in far less habitat affected by highseverity fire than thinning. In addition, much of the highseverity fire might occur regardless of thinning, especially if the efficacy of thinning in reducing high-severity fire is reduced as fire becomes more controlled by climate and weather (Cruz and Alexander 2010). Clearly, the strategy of trying to maintain more dense, late-successional forest habitat by reducing fire does not work if the method for reducing fire adversely affects far more of this forest habitat than would high-severity fire, and the high-severity fire might occur anyway because it is largely controlled by climate and weather.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even an immediate doubling of fire rates due to climate change or other factors would result in far less habitat affected by highseverity fire than thinning. In addition, much of the highseverity fire might occur regardless of thinning, especially if the efficacy of thinning in reducing high-severity fire is reduced as fire becomes more controlled by climate and weather (Cruz and Alexander 2010). Clearly, the strategy of trying to maintain more dense, late-successional forest habitat by reducing fire does not work if the method for reducing fire adversely affects far more of this forest habitat than would high-severity fire, and the high-severity fire might occur anyway because it is largely controlled by climate and weather.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the canopy stratum is a patchy over-story, then the stand has poor horizontal fuel continuity in the canopy layer. Such stands readily support passive crowning (torching) and spotting under low relative humidity, especially when surface fuels are in an (Alexander 1998;Cruz and Alexander 2010;Finney 1998Finney , 1999Scott 1998;Scott and Reinhardt 2001;Van Wagner 1977. The availability of fuels varies not only in space, but also in time with changes in weather (principally relative humidity, temperature, and drought) (Bessie and Johnson 1995;Flannigan and Wotton 2001;Johnson 1992;Schroeder and Buck 1970).…”
Section: Fire Behavior and Effects: Concepts And Models _____________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many important factors that affect crown fire are not included (Werth et al 2011). It is especially important for a user to be aware of model limitations in predicting extreme fire behaviour (Cruz and Alexander 2010).…”
Section: Crown Firementioning
confidence: 99%