Assessing competitive conditions in the Greek banking system

Hondroyiannis, George; Lolos, Sarantis; Papapetrou, Evangelia

doi:10.1016/s1042-4431(99)00017-7

Cited by 114 publications

(107 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are consistent with studies that concluded insignificant influence of bank capital on profitability (Staikouras & Steliaros;Hondroyiannis et al, 1999;Gibson, 2005). This result is inconsistent with previous studies that found that the bank capital has respectively significant positive and significant negative influences on ROA (Dawood, 2014;Alkhazaleh & Almsafir, 2014).…”

Section: Findings Discussion and Conclusionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…For bank loans and profitability (H1-3), as loans showed insignificant positive influence on ROA in agreement with Hondroyiannis et al (1999), this leads us to reject H1-3 A . Although loans show insignificant influence on ROE during the observed period, this influence is positive and significant in the pooled sample which leads us to accept H1-3 B .…”

Section: Findings Discussion and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 70%

“…In addition to above mentioned studies, an insignificant influence has been found for ownership on bank profitability in few studies (Staikouras & Steliaros, 1999;Hondroyiannis et al, 1999;Gibson, 2005). Consistent with most previous studies, the study expects positive influence for bank capital on its profitability.…”

Section: Bank Capitalmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Since Christian et al (2008) concluded a significant relationship between change in total assets of a bank with its profitability and loans have no explanatory power on bank profitability, some studies found negative influence of banks loans on their profitability (Staikouras and Steliaros, 1999;Hondroyiannis et al, 1999;Gibson, 2005) and negative influence of loans on their ROA has been concluded by Staikouras and Wood (2003).…”

Section: Bank Loansmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Financial Information Influencing Commercial Banks Profitability

Shamki¹,

Alulis²,

Sayari³

2016

IJEF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the influence of bank capital ratio, size and loans on the profitability of a commercial bank in Jordan. It also evaluates whether returns on Assets (ROA) or returns on equity (ROE) is the better indicator that reflects bank profitability. Two Multiple regression models are used to test the influence of capital ratio, size and loans of a commercial bank on its profitability indicators measured by ROA and ROE and to detect the superiority between the two indicators for 13 Jordanian commercial banks for the period 2005-2013. The results of the study showed that capital ratio, size and loans have insignificant influence on ROA, but not on ROE except bank size. Regarding ROE, significant negative and positive influence for capital ratio and loans respectively are concluded. Although the small number of commercial banks in Jordan and some variables have not been well researched in literature, the paper presents a sight to associate bank performance/profitability proxied by ROA and ROE with its capital ratios, size and loans. Our results might assist bank management to capitalize the factors that could improve banks performance and hedge against the adverse factors.

show abstract

Section: Findings Discussion and Conclusionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Findings Discussion and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Section: Bank Capitalmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Bank Loansmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Financial Information Influencing Commercial Banks Profitability

Shamki¹,

Alulis²,

Sayari³

2016

IJEF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…comp. : France, Germany, Spain, UK Vesala (1995) 1985-92 Finland monopolistic competition for all but two years Molyneux et al (1996b) 1986-88 Japan monopoly Coccorese (1998) 1988-96 Italy monopolistic competition Rime (1999) 1987-94 Switzerland monopolistic competition Hondroyiannis et al (1999) 1993-95 Greece monopolistic competition Bikker & Groeneveld (2000) 1989-96 15 EU countries monopolistic competition De Bandt and Davis (2000) 1992-96 France, Germany and Italy large banks: mon. comp.…”

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Market structure and competitive conditions in the Arab GCC banking system

Al‐Muharrami

Matthews

Khabari

2006

Journal of Banking & Finance

141

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in

show abstract

Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility

Idowu

Filho²

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing competitive conditions in the Greek banking system

Cited by 114 publications

References 8 publications

Financial Information Influencing Commercial Banks Profitability

Financial Information Influencing Commercial Banks Profitability

Market structure and competitive conditions in the Arab GCC banking system

Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About