2016
DOI: 10.1177/0148607116680792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASPEN‐FELANPE Clinical Guidelines

Abstract: In adult patients with enterocutaneous fistula: (1) What factors best describe nutrition status? (2) What is the preferred route of nutrition therapy (oral diet, enteral nutrition, or parenteral nutrition)? (3) What protein and energy intake provide best clinical outcomes? (4) Is fistuloclysis associated with better outcomes than standard care? (5) Are immune-enhancing formulas associated with better outcomes than standard formulas? (6) Does the use of somatostatin or somatostatin analogue provide better outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies have validated albumin as a good predictor of morbidity making it still a clinically relevant marker, possibly because it captures information on both malnutrition and degree of inflammatory state. Thus, its routine measurement remains recommended in the latest ASPEN clinical guidelines for enterocutaneous fistula management (27). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several studies have validated albumin as a good predictor of morbidity making it still a clinically relevant marker, possibly because it captures information on both malnutrition and degree of inflammatory state. Thus, its routine measurement remains recommended in the latest ASPEN clinical guidelines for enterocutaneous fistula management (27). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients can be maintained with enteral/parenteral nutritional support and wound care/management for a prolonged period, allowing for improvements in nutritional status and control of chronic co-morbidities before pursuing elective repair(18, 19, 27). In fact, recent literature demonstrates that waiting for a longer interim before definitive repair significantly improves outcomes, with an average wait time of 12 months vs. 8 months having improved success and post-operative survival(18, 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific research gaps in the evidence base for nutrition support practice are summarized in Table , some of which were identified by the evidence review in development of clinical guidelines . A pivotal research goal is the validation of the consensus strategies for the identification of malnutrition in adult and pediatric patients in varied clinical settings.…”
Section: Health Services Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific research gaps in the evidence base for nutrition support practice are summarized in Table 2, some of which were identified by the evidence review in development of clinical guidelines. [15][16][17] A pivotal research goal is the validation of the consensus strategies for the identification of malnutrition in adult and pediatric patients in varied clinical settings. Objective, clinically available measures of change in body composition could identify levels of malnutrition risk and clarify varied responses to nutrition support therapy.…”
Section: Health Services Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the indications, methods, benefits, and any problems associated with chyme reinfusion (CR) are poorly collated in the literature at present. There is a need for clarification of the role of CR in patients with high outputs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%