Armut Üretiminde Karşılaştırmalı Enerji Kullanım Etkinliği ve Ekonomik Analiz: Trakya Bölgesi Örneği

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Trakya Bölgesinde iyi tarım uygulaması yapan ve yapmayan armut üreten tarım işletmelerini kapsamaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı, iyi tarım uygulaması yapan ve yapmayan işletmelerin girdi kullanım miktarlarının ve enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi ve ekonomik olarak karşılaştırılmasıdır. Kırklareli Comparatively Energy Use Efficiency and Economic Analysis in Pear Farming: Case of Thrace Region A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Research ArticleReceived 26 April 2017 Accepted 04 July 2017This study includes the agricultural enterprises producing pear which apply and do not apply good agricultural practices in Thrace Region. The basic purpose of this study is the determination of input use amounts and energy use efficiency and economical comparison of the enterprises applying and not applying good agricultural practices. In Kırklareli, Edirne and Tekirdağ, 16 pear producers which carry through good agricultural practices participated in the survey. According to the results, total energy input, energy output, energy output/input ratio, energy productivity, specific energy, energy density and net energy were determined to be respectively as 30.046.64 MJ, 36.000 MJ, 1.20, 0.50 kg/MJ, 2.00 MJ/kg, 1.80 MJ/TL and 5.953.36 MJ in the enterprises applying good agricultural practices. Total energy input, energy output, energy output/input ratio, energy productivity, specific energy, energy density and net energy were determined to be respectively as 32.111.92 MJ, 33.600 MJ, 1.05, 0.44 kg/MJ, 2.29 MJ/kg, 2.05 MJ/TL and 1.488.08 MJ in the enterprises not applying good agricultural practices. In Thrace Region the cost of producing; one kg of pear was calculated 1.11 TL in the enterprises which applied good agriculture while it was calculated 1.12 TL at the enterprises which did not apply the good agriculture. Total expenses, gross output value, gross profit, net profit and relative profit were determined to be respectively as 16.682.80 TL, 24.250 TL, 14.938.10 TL, 7.567.20 TL and 1.45 in the enterprises applying good agricultural practices. Total expenses, gross output value, gross profit, net profit and relative profit were determined to be respectively as 15.652 TL, 21.000 TL, 11.511.80 TL, 5.348 TL and 1.34 in the enterprises not applying good agricultural practices. According to energy use efficiency and economic analysis results, pear farming was determined to be more advantageous in the enterprises applying good agricultural practices.

An Investigation on the Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Orange Production in Turkey

“…Agriculture-related energy balance and GHG emissions have been studied numerous times. These studies were on the production of crops such as, for example, oranges [18,23,24], mandarins [24,25], lemons [26,27], pomegranates [28,29], kiwi [30,31], strawberry [32], grape [33], apples [34,35], pears [36,37], olive [38], peaches [39,40], corn [41], sunflower [42,43], potatoes [44], cotton [45] and vegetables [46,47]. This study has been conducted on the grounds that there are no extensive studies in the literature in relation to the energy use, energy-use efficiency indicators, greenhouse gas emissions and ratios of orange production on the study area.…”

A Study on Determination of Energy Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Wheat Production

“…Studies on EUE and GHG emissions were conducted and continue to be done in the world and in Turkey. Mohammadi et al (2008), Tipi et al (2009), Barut et al (2011), Azarpour (2012), Alipour et al (2012), Baran and Karaağaç (2014), Baran et al (2015), Baran (2016), Bayhan (2016), Aydın et al (2017), Baran et al (2021), Çelen et al (2017), Çıtıl et al (2020), Aydın (2020), Demir et al (2022), Gökduman et al (2022), Demir and Gökdoğan (2023), Seydoşoğlu et al (2023), Turan et al (2023), Hacıoğlu et al (2024 conducted studies regarding the subject.…”