2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Schooling and Roads Complementary? Evidence from Income Dynamics in Rural Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, lowered costs of discovery and exchange of information, negotiation, and monitoring make it possible for traders to penetrate further into remote areas than they had previously been willing to do. In addition to highlighting the potential importance of new information and communication technologies as mediating factors in access to markets, Overå's study suggests two important aspects of access which would merit further theoretical elaboration: first, some of the fixed costs of transacting may have strong spatial expressions (i.e., increasing with remoteness); second, there may be important interaction effects between different types of infrastructure (a point echoed by Escobal and Torero's (2005) study of public asset complementarities; see also Yamauchi, Muto, Chowdhury, Dewina, and Sumaryanto (2011)). Related to the first point, in a recent paper, Stifel and Minten (2008) evaluate the impact of remoteness in rural Madagascar on food crop productivity and market participation.…”
Section: (B) Broader Views Of Remoteness and Rural Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, lowered costs of discovery and exchange of information, negotiation, and monitoring make it possible for traders to penetrate further into remote areas than they had previously been willing to do. In addition to highlighting the potential importance of new information and communication technologies as mediating factors in access to markets, Overå's study suggests two important aspects of access which would merit further theoretical elaboration: first, some of the fixed costs of transacting may have strong spatial expressions (i.e., increasing with remoteness); second, there may be important interaction effects between different types of infrastructure (a point echoed by Escobal and Torero's (2005) study of public asset complementarities; see also Yamauchi, Muto, Chowdhury, Dewina, and Sumaryanto (2011)). Related to the first point, in a recent paper, Stifel and Minten (2008) evaluate the impact of remoteness in rural Madagascar on food crop productivity and market participation.…”
Section: (B) Broader Views Of Remoteness and Rural Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, several systematic reviews have measured the effectiveness of gender-responsive social and economic interventions on women's empowerment. There are reviews on the effectiveness of money transfers, in cash and/or in kind, as well as those on land ownership, microfinancing, and business training interventions on women's empowerment (Brody et al, 2015;Dekker, 2013;Yoong et al, 2012;Vaessen et al, 2012;Stewart et al, 2010). On road infrastructure, the impact of rural road extensions has been reviewed (Hine et al, 2016), but the review did not include sex-disaggregated outcomes for women and girls.…”
Section: Why It Is Important To Do the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the research findings demonstrate that mixed interventions (economic skills and services alongside life skills and other training services) appear to be effective from women's economic empowerment perspective (Taylor et al, 2014). On the other hand, stand-alone interventions, such as, financial services have a positive impact on women's economic empowerment (Brody et al, 2015;Dekker, 2013;Yoong et al, 2012), but have a limited impact or no effect on female bargaining power in the household, on feminine needs-based goods or for children-related ones, or even female health outcomes (Taylor et al, 2014;Vaessen et al, 2012;Stewart et al, 2010).…”
Section: Why It Is Important To Do the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several contributions on the impact of road infrastructure are worth discussing: the impact of road infrastructure on labour markets (and education) is investigated for the US (Michaels, 2008) and Indonesia (Yamauchi et al, 2011), and on food collection, trade margins and traders' wages for Zaire (Minten and Kyle, 1999). Michaels uses the advent of the US Interstate Highway System, construction of which began in 1956 and was completed in 1975, as "a source of exogenous variation in trade barriers" to show an increase in trucking activity and retail sales of 7-10 percentage points, in connected relative to non-connected rural counties.…”
Section: What Do We Know From the Literature?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opening up to trade is not likely to explain a great deal of variation in the demand for skills. Identification -the key empirical challenge in measuring impacts of infrastructure -is covered by using (quality) improvements in road quality in Yamauchi et al (2011). Combining household panel and village census data for Indonesia for the period 1995-2007 they measure the impact of improved connectivity on household income growth and nonagricultural labour supply.…”
Section: What Do We Know From the Literature?mentioning
confidence: 99%