2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are fluctuations in oil consumption permanent or transitory? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apergis and Payne (2010) assessed the stationarity of oil consumption in the United States spanning the period 1960 to 2007 with the unit root tests of Lee and Strazicich (2003) and and found that oil consumption is stationary for a majority of states. Solarin and Lean (2016) probed the stationary properties of oil consumption in 57 countries for the period 1965-2012 and the study concluded that oil consumption is non-stationary in 38 countries while it is stationary in 19 countries. Burakov (2019) investigated the stationary process of oil consumption in 15 countries for the period 1990 to 2017 using the panel LM unit root test and concluded that oil consumption is stationary in the observed country.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apergis and Payne (2010) assessed the stationarity of oil consumption in the United States spanning the period 1960 to 2007 with the unit root tests of Lee and Strazicich (2003) and and found that oil consumption is stationary for a majority of states. Solarin and Lean (2016) probed the stationary properties of oil consumption in 57 countries for the period 1965-2012 and the study concluded that oil consumption is non-stationary in 38 countries while it is stationary in 19 countries. Burakov (2019) investigated the stationary process of oil consumption in 15 countries for the period 1990 to 2017 using the panel LM unit root test and concluded that oil consumption is stationary in the observed country.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying unit root tests, with endogenously determined structural breaks, the null hypothesis of a unit root in petroleum consumption was rejected for most of the states [13,21]. Solarin and Lean (2016) [2] examined the nonlinear stationarity properties of oil (petroleum) consumption for 57 countries over a 50-year period. They found that the consumption in two thirds of the countries contained a unit root, while the consumption in one third of the countries was stationary.…”
Section: -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the impact of these measures and policies could be transitory or permanent depending on whether oil consumption is a unit root process or not (i.e., stationary process). In view of this, it is important to employ unit root tests to determine which impact is likely to occur [2]. Admittedly, some research has investigated the stationarity of a number of energy variables in Jordan, being a country within panels of other countries [3,4].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, energy consumption per capita exhibits some sharp and smooth structural shifts (breaks) in its mean and/or trend levels, and the endogenously identified break dates correspond to specific macroeconomic events such as oil crises, Gulf War, Asian and global financial crises. Solarin and Lean () examined the integration properties of the total oil consumption in 57 countries for the 1965–2012 years. According to their findings, the oil consumption series in 21 countries follow a nonlinear path while those in the other countries are linear in nature.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to test for natural gas consumption series properties, by accounting for smooth and sharp breaks. However, existing studies like Kum (), Bolat et al (), Shahbaz et al (), Ozcan and Ozturk (), and Solarin and Lean () only consider sharp breaks. By allowing multiple breaks in the series, we can capture as many breaks as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%