1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12106.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Females Invisible Students? An Investigation of Teacher‐Student Questioning Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first hypothesis, proposing no gender differences in teacher -student interactions, was rejected as significant main effects for gender were found for 6 of the 11 categories, reflecting earlier findings by previous studies (e.g., Barba & Cardinale, 1991;Jones & Wheatley, 1990). These data, from the Teacher -Child Dyadic Interaction System, are presented in Table 2 (two-way analysis of variance).…”
Section: Classroom Observation Datasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The first hypothesis, proposing no gender differences in teacher -student interactions, was rejected as significant main effects for gender were found for 6 of the 11 categories, reflecting earlier findings by previous studies (e.g., Barba & Cardinale, 1991;Jones & Wheatley, 1990). These data, from the Teacher -Child Dyadic Interaction System, are presented in Table 2 (two-way analysis of variance).…”
Section: Classroom Observation Datasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Monaco aad Gaiar (1992) also have reported upon the marginalization of girls who cannot count on the same level of engagement with teachers as can boys. Others (Barbar & Cardinale, 1991;Brophy, 1985;Jones & Wheatley, 1990;Meece, 1987) have observed that such treatment is particularly likely in math and science classes, leading girls to question their ability at these subjects.…”
Section: Lack Of Voice Within the School Settingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This gender difference may reflect the fact that girls have less interaction with teachers (Jones & Wheatley, 1990;Simpson & Erikson, 1983), have less opportunity to speak in class (Brophy & Good, 1974), and receive more low-level questions than boys do (Barba & Cardinale, 1991). Thus, girls are not stimulated to engage in deep processing of information as much as boys are.…”
Section: The Development Of Gender Differences In Study Behavior Ut Tmentioning
confidence: 87%