1996
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1996.9943461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Developmental Differences in the Academic Study Behaviors of Elementary School Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier studies, according to Hancock et al (1996) and Leong and Hawamdeh (1999), the reason why boys did not like to read static screens consisting of text on a computer screen is probably due to the fact that boys more associate computers with dynamic games animation than girls do. Fan and Macredie (2006) carried out a research on Personalized Learning, which indicated that females showed less favourable attitudes towards computers.…”
Section: ______________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In earlier studies, according to Hancock et al (1996) and Leong and Hawamdeh (1999), the reason why boys did not like to read static screens consisting of text on a computer screen is probably due to the fact that boys more associate computers with dynamic games animation than girls do. Fan and Macredie (2006) carried out a research on Personalized Learning, which indicated that females showed less favourable attitudes towards computers.…”
Section: ______________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Así, las alumnas alcanzan mayores puntuaciones que los alumnos, mostrándose diferencias notorias y significativas en esta comparación para todas las subescalas evaluadas: Mnemotecnia, Planificación y Distracciones. Los resultados alcanzados coinciden con los de otras investigaciones que apuntaban a la existencia de diferencias a favor de las chicas en los hábitos de estudio (Aluja y Blanch, 2015;Córdoba et al, 2011;Hancock, et al, 1996;Lozano, González-Pienda, Núñez, Lozano, y Álvarez, 2001;Rojas et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…For example, Hancock, Stock, Kulhavy, and Swindell (1996) explicitly provided evidence of face validity for their…”
Section: Clarity Of Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%