1987
DOI: 10.1177/0011128787033004003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are all Victims Alike? The Adverse, Generalized, and Differential Impact of Crime

Abstract: Samples of crime victims (burglary, robbery, felonious assault) and nonvictims were compared to examine the short-term differential and generalized effects of crime on psychological, behavioral, and attitudinal measures. Victims were more likely to report experiencing higher levels of vulnerability, fear, and symptomology, and lower levels of self-efficacy. Also, victims were more likely to engage in protective behaviors. There were fewer differences, however, among the three groups of crime victims. Burglary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas numerous studies have been conducted to describe the psychosocial consequences of particular types of victimization (e.g., Freedy, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, & Tidwell, 1994;Frieze, Greenberg, & Hymer, 1987;Kilpatrick, Saunders, Veronen, Best, & Von, 1987;Sales, Baum, & Shore, 1984), only a handful compare symptoms across crime types (Davis & Brickman, 1996;Lurigio, 1987;Resick, 1987;Riggs & Foa, 1995;Wirtz & Harrell, 1987), and even fewer are specific to bias crime victimization Ehrlich, Larcom, & Purvis, 1994;Ephross, Barnes, Ehrlich, Sandnes, & Weiss, 1986;Herek, Cogan, & Gillis, 1999;. In part due to methodological issues, the results of these studies on bias crime victimization are somewhat inconsistent in their conclusions.…”
Section: Prior Literature On Hate Crime Victimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas numerous studies have been conducted to describe the psychosocial consequences of particular types of victimization (e.g., Freedy, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, & Tidwell, 1994;Frieze, Greenberg, & Hymer, 1987;Kilpatrick, Saunders, Veronen, Best, & Von, 1987;Sales, Baum, & Shore, 1984), only a handful compare symptoms across crime types (Davis & Brickman, 1996;Lurigio, 1987;Resick, 1987;Riggs & Foa, 1995;Wirtz & Harrell, 1987), and even fewer are specific to bias crime victimization Ehrlich, Larcom, & Purvis, 1994;Ephross, Barnes, Ehrlich, Sandnes, & Weiss, 1986;Herek, Cogan, & Gillis, 1999;. In part due to methodological issues, the results of these studies on bias crime victimization are somewhat inconsistent in their conclusions.…”
Section: Prior Literature On Hate Crime Victimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state of evidence suggests that adoption of such behaviors varies across populations, types of victimization, and contexts (Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2000;Fisher, Daigle, Cullen, & Santana, 2007;Guerette & Santana, 2010;Lurigio, 1987;Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2003). Past studies examining victims' protective behaviors indicate that individual characteristics, lifestyles that expose individuals to risk, past victimization experiences, and fear of crime are related to individuals' decisions to protect themselves (Fisher et al, 2000;Lurigio, 1987;Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como una reacción en cadena, las repercusiones de los eventos delictivos y los nuevos procedimientos de seguridad adoptados por los funcionarios diseminan el miedo en las redes sociales (Lurigio, 1987), minando las relaciones de confianza, aumentado el grado de precaución de las personas y consolidando la imagen de los bancarios como un grupo de riesgo (Ericson, Doyle, 2003;Bauman, 2000;Kennedy, Sacco, 1998;Zedner, 1997).…”
Section: Trastornos Familiaresunclassified