2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aqueous solubility, vapor pressure and octanol-water partition coefficient of two phthalate isomers dibutyl phthalate and di-isobutyl phthalate contaminants of recycled food packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Ishak et al investigated the temperature dependence of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and its isomer diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) [24]. They show that DBP is more hydrophobic than its counterpart through a combination of measurements of relative water solubility and determination of octanol-water partition coefficients.…”
Section: Aqueous Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Ishak et al investigated the temperature dependence of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and its isomer diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) [24]. They show that DBP is more hydrophobic than its counterpart through a combination of measurements of relative water solubility and determination of octanol-water partition coefficients.…”
Section: Aqueous Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results are also seen for dinonyl phthalate where the solubility of diesters with branched chains are higher than linear chains as reported by Letinski et al [20] In the same paper it was noted that DEHP also has a higher solubility than DnOP, however in both cases data is only available at 22°C. Aqueous solubility for DBP and DIBP obtained by Ishak et al [24] and calculations are compared in Table 2. The calculation of the solubility by Cousins and Mackay is simply a linear relation with the molecular volume and so does not differ significantly between isomers but is otherwise a close approximation.…”
Section: Aqueous Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Turbidimetry and nephelometry are also used but they are based on the precipitation of material and, due to the possibility of over-saturation, might be inaccurate [8]. The "saturation shake-flask method" is also widespread but it is time consuming [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The "generator column" method highly facilitates the reaching of solubility equilibrium [18] as the contacting area between the solid material and solvent is very high and the saturation concentration can be measured as usual in chromatography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%