2017
DOI: 10.4995/ijpme.2017.5857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate criteria set for personnel promotion across organizational levels using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

Abstract: Currently, there has been limited established specific set of criteria for personnel promotion to each level of the organization particularly among retail industries. This study is conducted in order to develop a personnel promotion strategy by identifying specific sets of criteria for each level of the organization. The complexity of identifying the criteria set along with the subjectivity of these criteria require the use of multi-criteria decision-making approach particularly the analytic hierarchy process … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, CR of paired matrices is examined. If CR is greater than 0.1, paired comparison should be recalculated until CR is less than or equals to 0.1 [39,40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, CR of paired matrices is examined. If CR is greater than 0.1, paired comparison should be recalculated until CR is less than or equals to 0.1 [39,40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workshops were held in each cooperative's headquarters, performing a paired comparison of the indicators for each critical point and the critical points for each systemic attribute with the stakeholders. The paired comparison was carried out using the Saaty scale (Table 1), which shows the importance of one criterion over another [67]. Once the weights were obtained, the inconsistency indices were calculated for each set of indicators for the same critical point and, subsequently, for the critical points and systemic attributes.…”
Section: ) Conceptual Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been frequently used for: estimating the productivity of suppliers (Wang et. al., 2017), choosing the models SCOR and GSCF (Ponis et al, 2015), ranging the information from partners through the supply chain (Ramanathan, 2013), making critical decisions on projecting a set of purchase channels (Barker & Zabinsky, 2011), planning personal decisions (Castillo et al, 2017) and so on. The AHP method is suitable for the situations when the combination of qualitative and quantitative criteria for making decisions is used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%