2013
DOI: 10.1134/s2079086413040075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to standardization of environmental quality: Alternatives to the standardization system in use in the Russian Federation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the practical implementation, the authors consider that it is necessary to establish a range of water content of chemical substances, which remains the stability of the functioning of the existing natural hydrobiocenoses. For the Upper Kama basin, the norms of permissible impact (NPI) was developed in accordance with the guidelines [47,48] and taking into account all mentioned conditions. The comparison of the norms, established by the method of calculating of NPI, and regional indicators (MPC reg ), calculated by the proposed method, revealed a very slight difference (table ).…”
Section: Issn 2224-5278mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the practical implementation, the authors consider that it is necessary to establish a range of water content of chemical substances, which remains the stability of the functioning of the existing natural hydrobiocenoses. For the Upper Kama basin, the norms of permissible impact (NPI) was developed in accordance with the guidelines [47,48] and taking into account all mentioned conditions. The comparison of the norms, established by the method of calculating of NPI, and regional indicators (MPC reg ), calculated by the proposed method, revealed a very slight difference (table ).…”
Section: Issn 2224-5278mentioning
confidence: 99%