Application of SSCS model (Search, Solve, Create and Share) for improving learning outcomes: the subject of optic geometric

Sukariasih, Luh; Ato, A. S.; Fayanto, Suritno; Nursalam, La Ode; Sahara, La

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032075

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The difficulties caused by the learners have limitations in determining the interpretive information in the problem [7]. Learners have requirements in different forms of knowledge essential to deal with the question of research, declarative knowledge (facts and concepts), operational knowledge (how to use facts and concepts in the processes or procedures) and strategic understanding) [8] [9]. Most students try hard to resolve complex problems and problem-solving strategies in schools are just the appropriate method or technique to solve organized and algorithmic problems that are taught in schools and universities [10], [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Description of Physics Problem-solving in the Topic of Static Fluid: Case Study of Physics Education in Halu Oleo University

Sukariasih¹,

Tahang²,

Nursalam³

et al. 2020

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Good physics teaching in secondary schools and colleges emphasize problem-solving. Although students are effective in conventional tests of problem-solving, there is evidence that they have little or no comprehension of basic concepts. There are two (2) reasons that justify the claim that solving plays a broad role in the physics curriculum at most levels of education, namely problem solving can facilitate students learning physics and physics can assist students in developing the skills needed to solve problems in the real world. This study aims to provide a descriptive description of the physics problem-solving ability of Halu Oleo university physics education students on static fluid material. This type of research is a quantitative descriptive study with research subjects in 4 classes of physics education students at Halu Oleo University. The research instrument and data collection made in the form of problem-solving essay test questions given to 120 students from 4 classes. The material of the investigation took one of the topics, namely static fluid. The problem-solving assessment consists of a useful description, physics approach, specific application of physics, mathematical procedures, logical progression adopted from the research of Docktor et al. 2016. The results of the analysis found that in the four classes that were tested on conceptual problem-solving tests, the average of all students were in the useful description category. In other words, students could only translate and organize information from problems into appropriate and useful representations, and summarize the essence of the information provided symbolically, visually and in writing. As for the category of physics approach, specific application of physics, mathematical procedures, logical progression that are in the low category is still weak.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Description of Physics Problem-solving in the Topic of Static Fluid: Case Study of Physics Education in Halu Oleo University

Sukariasih¹,

Tahang²,

Nursalam³

et al. 2020

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of the study (Lestari et al, 2020) show that learning SSCS with a quality contextual approach can improve mathematical literacy and self-efficacy. The results of the study (Sukariasih et al, 2019) shows that the SSCS model can improve high school student learning outcomes compared to conventional learning The results of the study (Yasin et al, 2020) show that SSCS learning has effectiveness which is relatively high so that it has an effect of 91.9% on the ability to think reflective and the ability to solve mathematical problems. Thus, effective SSCS learning can improve the ability to explore, predict, and reason logically, solve non-routine problems, communicate connect ideas in mathematics and other intellectual activities.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Adaptive Reasoning Based on Microsoft Mathematics

Susilawati

Rachmawati

Nuraida

2021

JTAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The demands of professional teachers to design technology-assisted learning that can facilitate all students to develop their potential. the fact that the quality of students' adaptive reasoning in solving math problems is still low which has an impact on other mathematical competencies. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the improvement of adaptive reasoning abilities between students who have implemented Search Solving Create and Share learning assisted with Microsoft Mathematics and conventional learning. The method used is quasi-experimental with the non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. Through the Simple Random Sampling technique, two classes were selected, namely class X1 and X2 one of the SMA in Bandung Indonesia. Test instrument: story questions about adaptive reasoning abilities. Analysis using independent T-test data. Result: There is a difference in the improvement in adaptive reasoning abilities between students who using search-solve-create- share learning assisted by Microsoft mathematics compared to conventional learning. Students' difficulties in solving story problems with adaptive reasoning abilities can be minimized by getting used to solving non-routine story problems. Learning search-solve-create-share assisted by Microsoft mathematics accustoms students to convey assumptions, provide reasons for answers, draw conclusions from statements, and students can find patterns of various mathematical problems through multi-interactive media.

show abstract

“…Data collection techniques in this study include: (1) written test that used to collect student learning outcomes data; (2) the observation that used to collect data that is held teacher learning process as the enforceability of teachers; and (3) documentation to obtain data on student learning outcomes into the study population before the learning process.…”

Section: Data Collection Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the obstacles faced by the world of knowledge is a subject of the weakness of the learning process. In the learning process, often, students are less encouraged to develop thinking skills [1] [2]. The learning method in the classroom accentuate the child's capability to memorize information [3], [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Cooperative Learning Type Group Investigation to Improve Physics learning Outcomes in Vocational Schools

Benly¹,

Kartowagiran²,

Sukariasih³

et al. 2020

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study proposes to analyze the differences in learning outcomes of pupils, who learn cooperative learning models of group investigation and conventional learning. The research sample consisted of class X a (30 people) who learned the cooperative learning model of the group investigation model and class X b (30 people) taught using conventional learning models with the topic of learning is basic electronic (capacitors). The sampling technique uses random sampling with a non-equivalent control group design. Data collection techniques consisted of written tests, observation sheets and documentation. Meanwhile, research instrument used achievement test (objective criteria) in the form of multiple-choice questions that comprise as many as 25 of the given level (C 1), understanding (C 2) applying (C 3) and analyzed. Students' test results were analyzed using descriptive statistical data analysis and inferential statistical data analysis. The analysis results obtained that there is a difference of learning outcomes between the experimental class and a control class with an average of 80.8 to 69.6 for the control class and experimental class. From the analysis, it was found that there was no significant difference between the experimental and control classes based on the N-gain value. So it can be concluded that the group investigation learning model does not have a significant effect on improving student learning outcomes.

show abstract

Application of SSCS model (Search, Solve, Create and Share) for improving learning outcomes: the subject of optic geometric

Cited by 12 publications

References 3 publications

Description of Physics Problem-solving in the Topic of Static Fluid: Case Study of Physics Education in Halu Oleo University

Description of Physics Problem-solving in the Topic of Static Fluid: Case Study of Physics Education in Halu Oleo University

Adaptive Reasoning Based on Microsoft Mathematics

Application of Cooperative Learning Type Group Investigation to Improve Physics learning Outcomes in Vocational Schools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About