2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2018.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model meteorological data for assessment of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) over India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 are weak (R = 0.34 for London, R = 0.23 for Birmingham) and do not improve if we apply a less strict threshold for the number of observations required to calculate monthly means. The poor correlation may be due to environmental factors that complicate the relationship between AOD and surface PM 2.5 , such as variability in meteorological conditions, aerosol composition, enhancements in aerosols above the boundary layer, and the aerosol radiative properties (Schaap et al, 2009;van Donkelaar et al, 2016;Shaddick et al, 2018;Sathe et al, 2019). We find that the same assessment is not feasible for Delhi or Kanpur as the record of surface PM 2.5 and PM 10 in these cities is too short.…”
Section: Assessment Of Modis Aodmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4 are weak (R = 0.34 for London, R = 0.23 for Birmingham) and do not improve if we apply a less strict threshold for the number of observations required to calculate monthly means. The poor correlation may be due to environmental factors that complicate the relationship between AOD and surface PM 2.5 , such as variability in meteorological conditions, aerosol composition, enhancements in aerosols above the boundary layer, and the aerosol radiative properties (Schaap et al, 2009;van Donkelaar et al, 2016;Shaddick et al, 2018;Sathe et al, 2019). We find that the same assessment is not feasible for Delhi or Kanpur as the record of surface PM 2.5 and PM 10 in these cities is too short.…”
Section: Assessment Of Modis Aodmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The AOD is always measured at a specific wavelength and represents columnar loading of atmospheric aerosols from the surface to top-of-the-atmosphere. There have been many studies ( Gupta et al, 2006 ; Liu, Paciorek, & Koutrakis, 2009 ; van Donkelaar, Martin, Li, & Burnett, 2019 ; Sathe et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2019; Christopher & Gupta, 2020 ) over the years to demonstrate the relationship between AOD and surface mass concentration of PM 2.5 . In this study, we have not used AOD to derive PM 2.5 but used it as a surrogate to assess the relative change in particle pollution in the atmosphere due to lockdown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional ground measurement method using PM 2.5 monitoring network can provide the accurate spatial and temporal data; however, it cannot be used for deriving PM 2.5 concentrations where the monitors are unavailable (Liu et al 2005;Yang et al 2018). The aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from satellites [e.g., Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC)] have been widely utilized for predicting PM 2.5 concentrations in different scales (Zeng et al 2018;Goldberg et al 2019;Mhawish et al 2019;Sathe et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%