2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Microwave Return Loss for sensing Internal Quality of Peaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the reflection coefficient depends on the material temperature T [10,11], the temperature of the samples was kept constant at 20±0.1 • C. Figure 1 illustrates the reflection coefficient as a function of frequency for various aqueous sucrose concentrations. Note that the measurements taken for the return loss and phase shift for each sample show that both quantities reach a constant value at a certain frequency.…”
Section: Reflection Coefficient Of Aqueous Sucrose Solutions In the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the reflection coefficient depends on the material temperature T [10,11], the temperature of the samples was kept constant at 20±0.1 • C. Figure 1 illustrates the reflection coefficient as a function of frequency for various aqueous sucrose concentrations. Note that the measurements taken for the return loss and phase shift for each sample show that both quantities reach a constant value at a certain frequency.…”
Section: Reflection Coefficient Of Aqueous Sucrose Solutions In the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some improvements were observed in separating the apples into three quality classes based on four to nine principal components, although some overlaps still existed among the classes. Lleo et al (2007) studied Microwave (MW) spectroscopy as an internal-quality estimating technique for peaches to establish the feasibility of MW measurements for firmness and sugar estimation. They showed that multiple linear regression models, based on return loss and reflectance variables, were not robust.…”
Section: Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flesh firmness of several species of fruits has been predicted by the above mentioned systems: apples (Duprat et al, 1997;Lemmertyn et al, 1998;Peleg, 1999;De Belie et al, 2000;Jarén and García-Pardo, 2002;Park et al, 2003;Shmulevich et al, 2003;Lu and Bailey, 2005;De Ketelaere et al, 2006;Noh and Lu, 2007;Peng and Lu, 2007;Kim et al, 2009); peaches or nectarines (Steinmetz et al, 1996;Peleg, 1999;Ruiz-Altisent et al, 2006;Lleó et al, 2007;Valero et al, 2007;Pérez-Marín et al, 2009;Subedi and Walsh, 2009); tomatoes (Duprat et al, 1997;Schotte et al, 1999;De Ketelaere and De Baerdemaeker, 2001;De Ketelaere et al, 2006;Mizrach, 2007); mangoes (Mizrach et al, 1997Jha et al, 2006;Subedi and Walsh, 2009); pears (Jarén and García-Pardo, 2002;Liu et al, 2008;Slaughter et al 2009);apricots (McGlone and Jordan, 2000;Bureau et al, 2009); bananas (Subedi and Walsh, 2009);kiwifruits (McGlone and Kawano, 1998;McGlone and Jordan, 2000;Terasaki et al, 2001); avocados ; plums (Valero et al, 2007); orange (M...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies examined and compared different excitations such as acoustic and mechanical impact (Shmulevich et al, 2003;De Ketelaere et al, 2006); acoustic and optic (Subedi and Walsh, 2009). In other studies two or more systems were used together to improve performances: sound plus impact plus micro-deformation (Steinmetz et al, 1996), microwave plus optical spectroscopy (Lleó et al, 2007); micro-deformation plus optical (Ruiz-Altisent et al, 2006). Some devices used laser systems to measure displacement or deformation induced mechanically by means of a shaker (Terasaki et al, 2001) or by air pressure puffs (McGlone and Jordan, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%