“…Non‐invasive techniques, such as dynamic gas disengagement and the photographic technique, like the endoscope technique, are limited because of some ineluctable hypotheses or strict measuring conditions, such as the requirement of a quasi‐2D apparatus, although they could be the “standard” against other techniques. Hence, the invasive techniques, like needle probes, are preferred for bubble behavior studies, such as those that investigate local gas holdup, bubble frequency, bubble velocity, and bubble diameter . In a system containing solid particles, the optical‐based techniques, such as the focused beam reflectance method, are more practical than other needle probes that pierce bubbles when the wear extent is considered.…”