2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apoptosis as a mechanism of natural resistance to HIV-1 infection in an exposed but uninfected population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that peripheral blood monocytes in the ESNs group had a greater predisposition to undergo spontaneous apoptosis as well as apoptosis induced by HIV infection in vitro , compared to monocytes from HCs at low risk of HIV infection. This suggests that monocytes could play an important role in the control of HIV infection by undergoing apoptosis [5]. …”
Section: Immune Response During Hiv-1 Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that peripheral blood monocytes in the ESNs group had a greater predisposition to undergo spontaneous apoptosis as well as apoptosis induced by HIV infection in vitro , compared to monocytes from HCs at low risk of HIV infection. This suggests that monocytes could play an important role in the control of HIV infection by undergoing apoptosis [5]. …”
Section: Immune Response During Hiv-1 Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain reports indicate that apoptosis of target cells [5], increased production of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) by natural killer (NK) cells [6] and positive regulation of costimulatory molecules [7] are factors associated with resistance. The humoral response contributes significantly to resistance to HIV infection through the production of anti- HIV IgA in mucosal [8] and finally, several soluble factors such as RNases, chemokines, cytokines and cationic proteins are involved in blocking HIV infection in ESNs or in decreasing the time required to disease progression in LTNPs individuals [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some genetic and immunological mechanisms have been associated with the resistant phenotype as follows: (i) genetic polymorphisms in the required co-receptors for viral entry, such as CCR5 or CCR2 ( 5 , 6 ); (ii) increased production of the co-receptor ligands MIP-1α/β, RANTES or SDF-1; (iii) the presence of antibodies blocking viral co-receptors ( 7 ); (iv) the expression of different microRNAs induced by the viral exposure ( 8 , 9 ) that may modulate the innate immune system or interfere directly with viral mRNAs blocking the infection ( 10 ); (v) induction of spontaneous apoptosis of target cells ( 6 , 11 ); (vi) production of soluble factors with antiviral activity, such as TRIM5α, APOBEC-3G, SAMHD-1, serpina1, elafin, Human neutrophil peptide, beta-defensins, and LL-37 ( 12 14 ), other proteins implicated in host defense and bacterial binding, such as bPRP2, Histatin-3, Lysozyme C, and SLPI ( 15 ), and the presence of non-cationic proteins in genital secretions with HIV-1 neutralizing activity ( 16 ); (vii) high activity of natural killer cells ( 17 , 18 ) and dendritic cells (DC) ( 19 ); (viii) high levels of neutralizing IgA antibodies ( 18 , 20 ), which are even associated with protection in vaccine clinical trials, as they could prevent HIV mucosal transcytosis ( 21 ); (ix) expression of the alleles HLA-B57 and -B27 that present immunodominant peptides ( 6 ); and (x) effective and polyfunctional profile of HIV-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the rapid spread of this virus, some individuals, known as exposed seronegatives (ESN), have an apparent resistance to HIV-1 infection despite multiple and repeated exposures [2]. Numerous factors have been proposed as potentially protective mechanisms including the rapid development of adaptive cellular [3] and humoral defenses [4], as well as certain elements of the innate immune response [5-7]. These findings have not been consistently reproduced from one study to another and among persons at high risk for HIV infection by the parenteral route [8]; only a 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene was demonstrably associated with protection against infection [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%