2008
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1a/06012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APMP/TCRI key comparison report of measurement of air kerma for medium-energy x-rays (APMP.RI(I)-K3)

Abstract: The APMP/TCRI Dosimetry Working Group performed the APMP.RI(I)-K3 key comparison of measurement of air kerma for medium-energy x-rays (100 kV to 250 kV) between 2000 and 2003. In total, 11 institutes took part in the comparison, among which 8 were APMP member laboratories. Two commercial cavity ionization chambers were used as transfer instruments and circulated among the participants. All the participants established the 100 kV, 135 kV, 180 kV and 250 kV x-ray beam qualities equivalent to those of the BIPM. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that for each laboratory i having a BIPM comparison result x i with combined standard uncertainty u i , the degree of equivalence with respect to the reference value is the relative difference D i = (K i -K BIPM,i ) / K BIPM,i = x i -1 and its expanded uncertainty U i = 2 u i . The results for D i and U i , expressed in mGy/Gy and including those of the present comparison, are shown in Table 13 and in Figure 1, which include the linked results of the corresponding regional key comparison APMP.RI(I)-K3 (Lee et al 2008). Note that these data, while correct at the time of publication of the present report, become out of date as laboratories make new comparisons with the BIPM.…”
Section: Degrees Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 72%
“…It follows that for each laboratory i having a BIPM comparison result x i with combined standard uncertainty u i , the degree of equivalence with respect to the reference value is the relative difference D i = (K i -K BIPM,i ) / K BIPM,i = x i -1 and its expanded uncertainty U i = 2 u i . The results for D i and U i , expressed in mGy/Gy and including those of the present comparison, are shown in Table 13 and in Figure 1, which include the linked results of the corresponding regional key comparison APMP.RI(I)-K3 (Lee et al 2008). Note that these data, while correct at the time of publication of the present report, become out of date as laboratories make new comparisons with the BIPM.…”
Section: Degrees Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 72%
“…It follows that for each laboratory i having a BIPM comparison result x i with combined standard uncertainty u i , the degree of equivalence with respect to the reference value is the relative difference D i = (K i -K BIPM,i ) / K BIPM,i = x i -1 and its expanded uncertainty U i = 2 u i . The results for D i and U i , expressed in mGy/Gy and including those of the present comparison and those of the linked APMP.RI(I)-K3 comparison [9], are shown in Table 13 and in Figure 1.…”
Section: Degrees Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 81%
“…It follows that for each laboratory i having a BIPM comparison result x i with combined standard uncertainty u i , the degree of equivalence with respect to the reference value is the relative difference D i = (K i -K BIPM,i ) / K BIPM,i = x i -1 and its expanded uncertainty U i = 2 u i . The results for D i and U i , expressed in mGy/Gy and including those of the present comparison and those of the linked APMP.RI(I)-K3 comparison [10], are shown in Table 13 and in Figure 1. Note that these data, while correct at the time of publication of the present report, become out of date as laboratories make new comparisons with the BIPM.…”
Section: Degrees Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 81%