2012
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/49/1a/06007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the ARPANSA, Australia and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays

Abstract: A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ARPANSA, Australia and the BIPM in the mediumenergy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement within the expanded uncertainty for the comparison of 7.7 parts in 10 3. No significant trend is observed in the results for the different radiation qualities. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For proper calibration and comparison, it is important that the response of the cavity ion chamber in a measurement laboratory remains the same as that in other measurements or calibration laboratories. It has normally been assumed in comparison programs [4,5] that the ion chamber response would be the same if the same reference environmental conditions are used throughout (i.e. the correction for air density and humidity is applied).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For proper calibration and comparison, it is important that the response of the cavity ion chamber in a measurement laboratory remains the same as that in other measurements or calibration laboratories. It has normally been assumed in comparison programs [4,5] that the ion chamber response would be the same if the same reference environmental conditions are used throughout (i.e. the correction for air density and humidity is applied).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%