“Any Alternative Is Great If I’m Incarcerated”: A Case Study of Court-Ordered Community Service in Los Angeles County

Abstract

California courts increasingly order community service for those convicted of nonviolent and minor misdemeanors or infractions, assigning unpaid work to be performed. While court-ordered community service has been used as an alternative to incarceration and the payment of fines, little is known about the monetary and personal costs for those completing it. A case study design is used to examine court-ordered community service performed in Southeast Los Angeles. Data were gathered from a quantitative dataset of 541 court files of those assigned to community service and 32 in-depth interviews with attorneys and court-ordered community service workers. While the quantitative data and Attorney interviews found that negative outcomes of community service can drive community service workers deeper into debt and result in new warrants that place defendants at risk for rearrest, individuals that completed community service appreciated the opportunity to pay off their criminal justice debts and stay out of jail.

Coerced work during parole: Prevalence, mechanisms, and characteristics

“…Those who cannot pay their criminal legal debts through employment, as well as those convicted of low‐level misdemeanors or legal violations, may be subject to court‐ordered community service. Such service typically involves manual labor like roadside maintenance, custodial work, and graffiti removal for governmental or nonprofit organizations (Herrera et al., 2019; Sonsteng‐Person et al., 2021). Public and nonprofit entities benefit from this (un)free labor, while workers are credited at rates below minimum wage (Herrera et al., 2019).…”

Better Than Jail: Social Policy in the Shadow of Racialized Mass Incarceration

“…Nonetheless, unorganized individual community service workers did not consider this possibility. Accordingly, they judged their work assignments within a binary frame of work or jail, and given that choice set, they indeed typically were grateful to avoid incarceration (Sonsteng-Person et al 2021).…”