Anxiety and depression in athletes assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) - a systematic scoping review

Abstract

Introduction: Poor mental health of athletes is major concern in sport. Typically, incidence/prevalence of mental health symptoms in athletes is studied using symptom-specific questionnaires. For symptoms of depression/anxiety, one such self-reporting questionnaire is the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
 Objective: The aim of this review was to synthesise and compare studies using the GHQ-12 in athletes to inform future research by identifying trends and gaps in the literature.
 Methods: A systematic search of five electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) was conducted on all published studies up to 1 January 2019. 1) participants were able-bodied athletes; 2) studies measured anxiety/depression using the GHQ-12; 3) studies were full original articles from peer-reviewed journals; 4) studies were published in English.
 Results: 32 studies were included in the review. Prevalence and incidence of symptoms of anxiety/depression ranged from 21-48% and 17-57% respectively. The majority of studies screening anxiety/depression using the GHQ-12 were cross-sectional. Almost 70% of studies used the traditional scoring method. The majority of study populations sampled all-male cohorts comprising football (soccer) players.
 Conclusion: The traditional scoring of 0-0-1-1 should be used with the cut-off set at ≥3. Also, the mean GHQ-12 score should be reported. Potential risk factors for symptoms of anxiety/depression (i.e. recent adverse life events, injury and illness, social support, pressure to perform and career transitioning) and a lack of prospective studies were identified. Future research should also broaden the spectrum of athlete populations used and try to improve response rates.

It Is Not Just Stress: A Bayesian Approach to the Shape of the Negative Psychological Features Associated with Sport Injuries

“…On the one hand, from a theoretical perspective, the inclusion of “anxiety” and “depression” at the level of “stress” in the model of Andersen and Williams may allow a conceptually different approach, being able to speak of a “negative triad”, and the need for empirical studies that can support this aspect in line with the proposals of Olmedilla and García-Mas in their GMSI [ 36 ]. On the other hand, the results seem to show that the presence of mental health indicators in sports practice is a fact of great importance, and not only from the perspective of injury [ 75 ]. In this sense, it seems necessary to implement psychology actions and programs for the promotion of mental health, and for the prevention of the basic indicators of the “negative triad”, in line with Brenner et al [ 76 ] and Henriksen et al [ 77 ].…”

Job Satisfaction and Psychological Distress among Teachers in Selected Schools in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria in 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Although rarely used, the Likert scoring approach provides psychometric advantages by reducing data skewness and a rating approach with a cut-off point of 8/9, identifying likely cases of the psychological distress premise on the rating scale [26]. However, in the GHQ-scoring method, a threshold cut-off of 2/3 was used [27]. Besides, SPSS Statistics 25 was used to analyze the data.…”

The Impact of COVID-19 on Male Semiprofessional Cricket Player’s Mental Health and Performance Following the Resumption of Sporting Events

“…Mental Health. More recent studies make use of a 12item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) (Armino et al, 2021) and Personal Health Questionnaire-9 (Myall et al, 2021). However, influenced by the findings of Vaughan et al's (2020) investigation using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ), this study adopted the following mental health instruments: DASS-21; ABQ, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS).…”