2015
DOI: 10.2174/2212707002666150701190225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant Activity of Uva di Troia Canosina: Comparison of Two Extraction Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter, it was purified on a synthetic adsorbent brominated resin, and the polyphenol content percentage was determined. Extracts were evaluated for their potential antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay, which measures the ability of test agents to scavenge radicals [46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, it was purified on a synthetic adsorbent brominated resin, and the polyphenol content percentage was determined. Extracts were evaluated for their potential antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay, which measures the ability of test agents to scavenge radicals [46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracts were evaluated for their potential antioxidant effects by using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay which measures the ability of test agents to scavenge radicals [ 52 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, the extract was purified on a synthetic adsorbent brominated resin and percentage of polyphenol content was determined. The extracts were evaluated for their potential antioxidant effects by using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay which measures the ability of test agents to scavenge radicals [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%