2007
DOI: 10.3201/eid1305.060027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibodies againstLeptospiraspp. in Captive Collared Peccaries, Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the prevalence of seropositive animals with leptospirosis antibodies to one or more serovars was high (70.4%) and similar to the seroprevalence of a T. pecari population (65.0%) at Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, Santa Cruz, Bolivia (Karesh et al 1998). The prevalence of leptospirosis antibodies in our study population was high compared with prevalence in a wild population of collared peccaries (P. tajacu) in Arizona, USA, i.e., 23.0% (Corn et al 1987), but was similar to the findings of Mendoza et al (2007) for captive populations of P. tajacu in the Eastern Amazon. The high percentage of seropositive animals that we observed for T. pecari may be associated with favorable environmental conditions for Lepstospira spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the prevalence of seropositive animals with leptospirosis antibodies to one or more serovars was high (70.4%) and similar to the seroprevalence of a T. pecari population (65.0%) at Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, Santa Cruz, Bolivia (Karesh et al 1998). The prevalence of leptospirosis antibodies in our study population was high compared with prevalence in a wild population of collared peccaries (P. tajacu) in Arizona, USA, i.e., 23.0% (Corn et al 1987), but was similar to the findings of Mendoza et al (2007) for captive populations of P. tajacu in the Eastern Amazon. The high percentage of seropositive animals that we observed for T. pecari may be associated with favorable environmental conditions for Lepstospira spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The infections are described in a wide range of hosts that include humans, and domestic and wild animals. People contract leptospirosis through water that has been contaminated by the urine of infected animals (Mendoza et al 2007). In cattle, the disease can affect productivity by causing miscarriages, a reduction in milk output, weight loss, and even death (Santos et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leptospirosis is caused by bacteria of the genus Leptospira 1 considered the most widespread zoonotic disease worldwide 3 , and the unsanitary conditions maintained in urban areas using sewer rats as reservoirs 4 . Several domestic and wild animals, including the species studied here, are considered as potential reservoirs and may shed leptospires in their urine, spreading infection directly or indirectly, through urine or contaminated water, respectively 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the animals assessed in the present study were found to be negative for Leptospira sp., these wild mammals might act as environmental sentinels and/or infection disseminators, particularly for toxoplasmosis, and pose a risk of human contamination through meat consumption. In addition, vertical transmission of T. gondii through gestation and horizontal transmission through oocyst ingestion from contaminated soil, food, or water might occur among humans or animal species 4,15 . More free-ranging capybaras were found to be positive for T. gondii than captive capybaras in the present study, indicating that the captive environment was more controlled, thereby impeding pathogen transmission between wild and domestic felids (definitive hosts), capybaras, and peccaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%