2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial action of chitosan-arginine against Escherichia coli O157 in chicken juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to zone of inhibition the CuO-NPs as seen in Table 1 exhibited more inhibitory activity towards gram negative than gram positive bacteria as seen in (Fig.7, Table 1 ) because there is a difference in structure of the bacterial cell wall as gram negative cell wall consists of single peptidoglycan layer while gram positive cell wall have several peptidoglycan layers 12 , in contrast to J. Emima Jeronsia et al, who observed that the Grampositive bacterial strains have higher sensitivity to CuO-NPs than Gramnegative 44 . In our research we demonstrated the antibacterial activity of chitosan towards Gram positive and gram-negative bacteria as recorded in Table.2 and agreed with many investigation recorded that chitosan shows antibacterial activity towards both gram-negative and Gram positive bacteria due to the nature of chitosan surface of as polycation of high charge density which tightly attached and absorbed onto the surface of bacterial membrane to disrupt the cell membrane, thus kill bacterial cells 27,28,45,46 . Also Chitosan can form various chemical bonds with metal particles and prevents agglomeration, thus increasing the stability of the NPs 26 .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…According to zone of inhibition the CuO-NPs as seen in Table 1 exhibited more inhibitory activity towards gram negative than gram positive bacteria as seen in (Fig.7, Table 1 ) because there is a difference in structure of the bacterial cell wall as gram negative cell wall consists of single peptidoglycan layer while gram positive cell wall have several peptidoglycan layers 12 , in contrast to J. Emima Jeronsia et al, who observed that the Grampositive bacterial strains have higher sensitivity to CuO-NPs than Gramnegative 44 . In our research we demonstrated the antibacterial activity of chitosan towards Gram positive and gram-negative bacteria as recorded in Table.2 and agreed with many investigation recorded that chitosan shows antibacterial activity towards both gram-negative and Gram positive bacteria due to the nature of chitosan surface of as polycation of high charge density which tightly attached and absorbed onto the surface of bacterial membrane to disrupt the cell membrane, thus kill bacterial cells 27,28,45,46 . Also Chitosan can form various chemical bonds with metal particles and prevents agglomeration, thus increasing the stability of the NPs 26 .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This supports the findings of Lahmer et al . () that also showed that Ch‐arg was less active against nongrowing cells at 4 °C in comparison with those more metabolically active being held at 20 °C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pengujian aktivitas antibakteri dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode OD λmax 600 nm (Sezonov et al, 2007dan Matlock et al, 2011 terhadap bakteri Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, meliputi 3 tahap sebagai berikut: a. Persiapan Media Media pertumbuhan bakteri Escherichia coli yang digunakan adalah Luria Bertani (LB) (Lahmer et al, 2012;Matlock et al, 2011;Sezonov et al, 2007dan Tang et al, 2010 Pengujian antibakteri dilakukan dengan mengukur adsorbansi larutan sampel jam ke-0, 3, 6, 9, 12, dan 24 menggunakan spektrofotometer UV-Vis pada λmax 600 nm secara duplo (Sezonov et al, 2007dan Matlock et al, 2011. Pada uji saponin timbulnya busa pada uji Forth menunjukkan adanya glikosida yang mempunyai kemampuan membentuk buih dalam air yang terhidrolisis menjadi glukosa dan senyawa lainnya (Marliana, 2005 (Marliana, 2005).…”
Section: Uji Antibakteriunclassified