Anti-American Sentiment and America's Perceived Intent to Dominate: An 11-Nation Study

Glick, Peter; Abrams, Dominic; Dardenne, Benoît; Ferreira, Maria Cristina; González, Roberto; Hachfeld, Christopher; Huang, Li Li; Hutchison, Paul; Manganelli, Anna Maria; Masser, Barbara M.; Mucchi‐Faina, Angelica; Okiebisu, Shinya; Rouhana, Nadim N.; Sáiz, José L.; Sakallı-Uğurlu, Nuray; Volpato, Chiara; Yamamoto, Masaaki; Yzerbyt, Vincent

doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2804_10

Cited by 27 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, at an international relations level, such differentiation might be important. Glick et al. (2006) found that across different countries, participants expressed more contempt toward the U.S. government compared to American citizens, but in most samples there were no differences in levels of admiration and envy toward these two target subgroups.…”

Section: Discussion Of Studymentioning

confidence: 95%

Assessing the Internal Validity of Image Theory in the Context of Turkey-U.S. Relations

Bilali

2010

Political Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research examines propositions of international image theory in the context of Turkey-U.S. relations. Study 1 derives and tests hypotheses regarding the interrelationships among theory components-perceived strategic relations, images, and behavioral tendencies. In addition, it extends image theory research by examining (1) the role of emotions, as well as (2) how variations in the strength of ingroup identifications (national and religious identity) inform our understanding of international images. Study 2 extends the findings of Study 1 by considering different dimensions of cultural status (cultural heritage vs. modernity) and by differentiating two targets of emotion: the U.S. government versus American citizens.Evidence is provided regarding the need for incorporation of emotions and group identifications onto the image theory framework. The results point to the need for more investigation of images and their relationships with other components of the theory in various intergroup contexts.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Studymentioning

confidence: 95%

Assessing the Internal Validity of Image Theory in the Context of Turkey-U.S. Relations

Bilali

2010

Political Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These findings suggest that the findings for competence and group status may not be as universal as Glick et al (2004) suggested; rather, there may be culture-specific content in the Indian subcontinent for stereotypes derived from historical representations or narratives (see Liu & Hilton, 2005) that do not rely on internal ability attributions as a basis for establishing hegemony (see J. G. Miller, 1984).…”

Section: Warmth Versus Competencementioning

confidence: 88%

“…Status and power elevate a group's perceived competence, whereas a group's competitiveness lowers its perceived warmth. In a recent cross-cultural study, Glick et al (2004) revealed that respondents from 11 nations characterized the United States and its citizens as competent but lacking warmth. This characterization was mediated by perceptions of the nation's competitiveness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intergroup Attributions and Ethnocentrism in the Indian Subcontinent

Khan

Liu

2008

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predictions of Pettigrew's ultimate attribution error were investigated among 148 Indians (91 Hindus and 57 Muslims) and 145 Pakistanis (107 Muslims and 38 Hindus) in the Indian subcontinent. Using hypothetical scenarios, the first prediction, that negative behavior would be attributed more to dispositional than situational factors for out-group compared to in-group actors, received little support. The second prediction, that positive out-group behavior would be attributed more to situational circumstances, received considerable but not total support. Hindu participants attributed in-group actors as more competent but also warmer in Pakistan, whereas Muslim participants attributed in-group actors as being warmer in both countries. Autostereotypes (rather than heterostereotypes) of competence and warmth consistently mediated ethnocentric intergroup attributions. Collective self-esteem mediated ethnocentrism among both groups in Pakistan but only among Muslims in India, whereas social dominance orientation mediated majority group biases in both countries. Overall, the ultimate attribution error received mixed support, and results supported an in-group favoring more than out-group derogating pattern.Intergroup attribution refers to the manner in which individuals explain the behaviors of members of their own and other social groups. Attributions made for the behavior of in-group and out-group members are often ethnocentric. Pettigrew (1979) formulated the "ultimate attribution error" (UAE), an extension of the fundamental attribution error (Heider, 1958;Ross, 1977), as a systematic pattern of ethnocentric attributions. The UAE postulates that (a) when people perceive what they regard as a negative act performed by an out-group member, they are more likely to make attributions to dispositional factors in comparison to the same act carried out by an in-group member, and (b) when people perceive what they regard as a positive act performed by an out-group member, they are more likely to make attributions to situational factors in comparison to the same act carried out by an in-group member. He reported three published studies in support of these predictions.In line with this scarcity of empirical evidence, progressive studies have persistently failed to provide unqualified support for intergroup attributional biases (e.g., Hewstone &

show abstract

“…The SCM likewise describes patterns of resentment toward (enviable) Asians in the U.S. (15), Americans in other countries (43, 44), and politicians everywhere (45). Other enviable outgroup members (rich people, business people) specifically elicit envy-consistent Schadenfreude (malicious glee at their misfortunes), measured by self report, smile-muscle activation, and neural reward centers (46, 47).…”

Section: Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Fiske

2015

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

164

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impressions of others, including societal groups, systematically array along two dimensions, warmth (trustworthiness/friendliness) and competence. Social structures of competition and status respectively predict these usually orthogonal dimensions. Prejudiced emotions (pride, pity, contempt, and envy) target each quadrant, and distinct discriminatory behavioral tendencies result. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) patterns generalize across time (2oth century), culture (every populated continent), level of analysis (targets from individuals to subtypes to groups to nations), and measures (from neural to self-report to societal indicators). Future directions include individual differences in endorsement of these cultural stereotypes and how perceivers view combinations across the SCM space.

show abstract

Anti-American Sentiment and America's Perceived Intent to Dominate: An 11-Nation Study

Cited by 27 publications

References 7 publications

Assessing the Internal Validity of Image Theory in the Context of Turkey-U.S. Relations

Assessing the Internal Validity of Image Theory in the Context of Turkey-U.S. Relations

Intergroup Attributions and Ethnocentrism in the Indian Subcontinent

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About