2002
DOI: 10.1006/jeth.2001.2960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another Look at the Radner–Stiglitz Nonconcavity in the Value of Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model differs because instead of facing a binary decision about whether or not to learn (they either enter an occupation or they do not), workers can 3 The fact that patterns of experimentation are often non-monotonic and complex is a manifestation of the of the famous Radner and Stiglitz (1984) result that the value of information is non-concave. This result is generalized by Chade and Schlee (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our model differs because instead of facing a binary decision about whether or not to learn (they either enter an occupation or they do not), workers can 3 The fact that patterns of experimentation are often non-monotonic and complex is a manifestation of the of the famous Radner and Stiglitz (1984) result that the value of information is non-concave. This result is generalized by Chade and Schlee (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For the rest of the N − 2 jobs, the higher is α j , the more output depends on θ. 6 Information in the model is symmetric; firms and workers have common priors on θ, k is known to everyone and output is commonly observed. Workers and firms acquire additional information about a worker's unknown skill through successive observations of output.…”
Section: Environment Technology and Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radner and Stiglitz [25] discusses the problem in considerably greater depth, giving general conditions under which the value of information is not concave. This research has been extended more recently by Chade and Schlee [26] and Delara and Gilotte [27] to more general settings.…”
Section: The S-curve Problemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Before selecting a project, the decision maker may acquire information about one or more projects. 1 See also Chade and Schlee (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%