1963
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.131.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Thermoelectric Power as Evidence for Two-Valence Bands in SnTe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

28
211
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
28
211
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…No bipolar effect is evident, even up to 873 K, in all the compositions despite the small band gap ∼0.18 eV for SnTe (29,31). All the measured Seebeck coefficients are positive, consistent with the density of states (DOS) calculation presented in (27). The carrier concentration obtained in this work is ∼2.35 × 10 20 cm −3 (filled circle).…”
Section: G Ood Thermoelectric (Te) Materials Should Not Only Have Highsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No bipolar effect is evident, even up to 873 K, in all the compositions despite the small band gap ∼0.18 eV for SnTe (29,31). All the measured Seebeck coefficients are positive, consistent with the density of states (DOS) calculation presented in (27). The carrier concentration obtained in this work is ∼2.35 × 10 20 cm −3 (filled circle).…”
Section: G Ood Thermoelectric (Te) Materials Should Not Only Have Highsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The carrier concentration obtained in this work is ∼2.35 × 10 20 cm −3 (filled circle). Unlike PbTe and PbSe (7,9,36,39,40), the Seebeck coefficient of SnTe shows abnormal variation with increasing carrier concentration, which was qualitatively explained previously by two parabolic band models (27) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations (31). The valence band model (VBM), which takes into account the nonparabolicity of the light-hole band (solid line), provides a quantitative fit to all the Seebeck coefficient data, except for those of In-doped samples, and thus is expected to best depict the contribution from the intrinsic band structure of SnTe (29).…”
Section: G Ood Thermoelectric (Te) Materials Should Not Only Have Highmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PbTe [28][29][30] and SnTe [31][32][33][34] both have a higher-energy L and a lower-energy Σ valence band. In pristine materials with optimized carrier concentrations, the lower-energy offset between these two bands in PbTe (0.17 eV 29,30,35 at 300 K) compared with that in SnTe (0.3-0.4 eV 32,34 at 300 K) leads to a much higher-power factor (30 μW cm − 1 K − 2 36 ) for PbTe than that for SnTe (20 μW cm − 1 K − 2 37 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%