2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous events removal for automated traffic noise maps generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the recordings, the presence of acoustic events non-related to road traffic (e.g., sirens, horns, works, dogs' barks, airplanes flyovers, etc.) may occur [13]. As a consequence, the collected acoustic data should be cleaned of these undesired events before feeding the noise map creation software [13] to avoid biasing the computation of the A-weighted equivalent sound levels (L Aeq ) beyond 2 dB, as recommended by the European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (WG-AEN) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the recordings, the presence of acoustic events non-related to road traffic (e.g., sirens, horns, works, dogs' barks, airplanes flyovers, etc.) may occur [13]. As a consequence, the collected acoustic data should be cleaned of these undesired events before feeding the noise map creation software [13] to avoid biasing the computation of the A-weighted equivalent sound levels (L Aeq ) beyond 2 dB, as recommended by the European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (WG-AEN) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may occur [13]. As a consequence, the collected acoustic data should be cleaned of these undesired events before feeding the noise map creation software [13] to avoid biasing the computation of the A-weighted equivalent sound levels (L Aeq ) beyond 2 dB, as recommended by the European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (WG-AEN) [14]. In this context, the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of these acoustic events becomes a crucial parameter to evaluate and model [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Independent sources of sounds have been identified and highlighted to show how they exhibit differences both in time and frequency. These sounds spectrograms with another sensor can be found in [55,56], where a class II microphone was used to conduct the acquisition of the sounds. The analysis of characteristic sounds such as a siren and a motorbike depicts that they have the same spectrum and time distribution, despite them having been collected in different cities.…”
Section: Preliminary Results Of Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, the DYNAMAP system was equipped with a dedicated algorithm embedded in the noise sensors for the detection of anomalous noise events (ANEs), i.e., noise events unrelated to road traffic noise [26][27][28]. Therefore, also the recorded data required to be manually cleaned up using the procedure described in Alsina-Pagés et al [29].…”
Section: Measuring Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%