2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-237x(200007)84:4<429::aid-sce1>3.3.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies and conflicts in classroom discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature emphasizes that the teaching of science is based on the construction of knowledge through the formation of discussion groups [11][12][13][14][15] and on the use of tools such as games, movies and videos, Internet sites, and software packages [16 -20]. Theoretical explanations associated with the use of educational resources facilitate the understanding of biological concepts, and the participants are constantly challenged to solve the proposed questions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Model And Methodology Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature emphasizes that the teaching of science is based on the construction of knowledge through the formation of discussion groups [11][12][13][14][15] and on the use of tools such as games, movies and videos, Internet sites, and software packages [16 -20]. Theoretical explanations associated with the use of educational resources facilitate the understanding of biological concepts, and the participants are constantly challenged to solve the proposed questions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Model And Methodology Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, as interações discursivas (simbólicas) mediadas pelo professor são consideradas como fundamento do processo de construção de significados para a formação de uma cultura científica (MORTIMER, 2000).…”
Section: Conclusão -Lacuna -Necessidade E Liberdadeunclassified
“…Sabemos que não são idênticas (MORTIMER, 2000), que há lacunas entre elas, e isso nos leva a outra série de perguntas: Quais lacunas de entendimento podem ser identificadas no processo dialógico entre professores e estudantes no ensino de Física? Que situações produzem essas lacunas?…”
unclassified
“…In some contexts it has a dominant, evaluative function, but it can also be: "an opportunity to extend the student's answer, to draw out its significance, or make connections with the student's experience" (Wells, 1999, p. 200). In line with this idea, Mortimer and Machado (2000) have aligned the IRF pattern with pedagogical aims by classifying the classroom discourse structure on the basis of the form of the third move action in the dialogue. The IRF pattern can be considered 'authoritative' as long as the feedback from the teacher is an evaluation-this can also be expressed by 'IRE', where 'E' stands for evaluation.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mortimer and Machado (2000), this varying of the discussion type between authoritative and dialogic discussion forms the 'rhythm' of classroom discussion. Such a rhythm is dependent upon the teaching purposes and aims, with different types of discussion being used accordingly.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%