1970
DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(70)90287-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular distribution of electrons ejected by charged particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with a gas atom [4][5][6][7][8]. For light projectiles the semiclassical Binary Encounter Approximation (BEA) [9,10] and quantum mechanical Born approximation calculations [11] are reproducing these data reasonably well in a number of cases [8,107. For projectiles heavier than argon no data have been published, and there are no theoretical predictions for the electron energy spectra available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…with a gas atom [4][5][6][7][8]. For light projectiles the semiclassical Binary Encounter Approximation (BEA) [9,10] and quantum mechanical Born approximation calculations [11] are reproducing these data reasonably well in a number of cases [8,107. For projectiles heavier than argon no data have been published, and there are no theoretical predictions for the electron energy spectra available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This tradition was continued with Thomas' genius analysis of electron capture in 1927 [15] and later with the binary encounter model for ionization [16]. For problems with one active electron, the "classical trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) Method" [17] was developed as an efficient algorithm with, quite often, quantitative predictive power.…”
Section: A Classical Over Barrier Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilization of the latter leads to the appearance of "tails" in the energy distributions for high-energy &electrons. But application of the cross-section [7] in the Monte-Carlo calculation is associated with great difficulties and therefore a simpler expression was used [9], since the energy dependence of the differential cross-section da/dQ(e) ( E is the kinetic energy of the %electron) for all cross-sections turned out to be the same da/ds = 1/82, An arbitrary choice of the &electron energy was performed according to the formula given in [9], for which a simple algorithm may be suggested, based upon Neiman's rejection method. The direction in which a S-electron is emitted is determined from kinematic relations.…”
Section: Principles Of the Calculation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the frame of the BEA model in [7] the scattering cross-sections with consideration of the velocity distribution of atomic electrons were obtained. Utilization of the latter leads to the appearance of "tails" in the energy distributions for high-energy &electrons.…”
Section: Principles Of the Calculation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%