2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: A prospective randomized clinical trial

Abstract: The use of stent grafts in angioplasty for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis significantly improved short-term restenosis rates and long-term patency compared with the use of bare stents. The significant improvement that emerged during the study caused accrual of patients to be halted for ethical reasons. This study altered our usage of stents for venous stenoses in arteriovenous accesses by eliminating bare nitinol stents in favor of stent grafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the necessity for repeat treatment of relapses, avoidance of central venous dialysis catheters as a prophylaxis for central venous obstructions continues to be recommended [21]. In patients with central recurrent stenoses of the cephalic vein, superiority of covered stent grafts compared to normal bare stents in relation to the patency rate was able to be shown [90]. However, these results are a subject of controversy since the placement of a covered stent could induce central stenoses and occlusions that would prevent future placement of an ipsilateral vascular access [91].…”
Section: Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the necessity for repeat treatment of relapses, avoidance of central venous dialysis catheters as a prophylaxis for central venous obstructions continues to be recommended [21]. In patients with central recurrent stenoses of the cephalic vein, superiority of covered stent grafts compared to normal bare stents in relation to the patency rate was able to be shown [90]. However, these results are a subject of controversy since the placement of a covered stent could induce central stenoses and occlusions that would prevent future placement of an ipsilateral vascular access [91].…”
Section: Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition diabetes and hyperglycemia has been shown to have significant impact upon both endothelial dysfunction and proinflammatory pathways of atheroma [19]. Despite this, a lower than predicted incidence of diabetes in those with cephalic arch stenosis has been a consistent finding in multiple other studies [5,20,15]. Hammes et al have proposed that patients with diabetes have a wider cephalic arch than those without, thus reduced haemodynamic stress in this area [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study of 11 patients demonstrated 6 month primary patency to be 82% with a Viabahn stent [3]. Another study retrospectively compared stent grafting with bare metal stents [15], finding primary patency to be 32% at 12 months with Viabahn stents compared to 0% with bare metal stents. Stent grafting should be considered with recurrent cephalic arch stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gore, Flagstaff, AZ), external surface (Fluency; Bard Peripheral, Phoenix, AZ), or both internal and external surfaces of the stent (Flair; Bard Peripheral). These devices specifically target stenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis (VGA) and cephalic arch regions (1)(2)(3). In addition, investigators are using these devices in the management of arteriovenous access-associated pseudoaneurysms (4 -7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%