The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02380310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent Graft for Nephrologists

Abstract: The role of the stent graft is emerging in the management of arteriovenous dialysis access. Physicians are incorporating this device in the management of three distinct problems-vein-graft anastomotic stenosis, pseudoaneurysm formation, and cephalic arch stenosis-with varying degrees of success. Indeed, a recent randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the role of angioplasty plus stent graft versus angioplasty alone for the management of stenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis led to the approval of the stent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the frequency of AVG thrombosis did not differ between the two groups. Given the high expense of stent grafts (approximately $2000 each) and their unproven benefit in terms of preventing AVG thrombosis, their routine deployment to treat AVG stenosis cannot be justified at this time (26). Two larger ongoing RCTs, RENOVA (flair endovascular stent graft post-approval trial) and REVISE (Gore Viabahn endoprosthesis versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to revise arteriovenous grafts at the venous anastomosis in hemodialysis patients) are evaluating two different brands of stent grafts to assess whether they improve AVG patency after angioplasty of a venous anastomotic stenosis.…”
Section: Why Surveillance With Preemptive Angioplasty Does Not Prevenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the frequency of AVG thrombosis did not differ between the two groups. Given the high expense of stent grafts (approximately $2000 each) and their unproven benefit in terms of preventing AVG thrombosis, their routine deployment to treat AVG stenosis cannot be justified at this time (26). Two larger ongoing RCTs, RENOVA (flair endovascular stent graft post-approval trial) and REVISE (Gore Viabahn endoprosthesis versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to revise arteriovenous grafts at the venous anastomosis in hemodialysis patients) are evaluating two different brands of stent grafts to assess whether they improve AVG patency after angioplasty of a venous anastomotic stenosis.…”
Section: Why Surveillance With Preemptive Angioplasty Does Not Prevenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The other common cause for stent fracture is when placed across joints especially across the elbow or the shoulder joint. 27,28 When the stents thrombose in peripheral lesions they can present with clotted dialysis access while if they thrombosis when placed in central lesions based on the collateral supply could present with acute central vein occlusion syndrome. 17,26 Acute stent thrombosis This can present acutely especially with stents are placed across arterio-venous junctions in AVG or when placed in central veins.…”
Section: Stent Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction 20 . The use of various types of stents as a treatment of cephalic arch stenosis has been reported 21 .…”
Section: Stent Use In Special Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary fistulas constitute an excellent option for patients with failing AVGs with excellent primary and secondary patency rates 32 . The high cost of stents is another factor of consideration, raising concern into whether the benefits obtained by placing stents at VGA stenosis sites outweigh the costs associated with such treatment 20 . Careful thought should be given to the option of creating a secondary AVF as an alternative treatment to placing a stent at a VGA stenosis site.…”
Section: Stent Use In Special Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%