1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199904150-00451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiographic Follow Up of Percutaneous Revascularization for Transplant Coronary Artery Disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously reported our short-term results with PTCA. 14 In the present report, we present a single-center experience (97 lesions in 33 transplant patients) with percutaneous re-vascularization, including results of short-and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported our short-term results with PTCA. 14 In the present report, we present a single-center experience (97 lesions in 33 transplant patients) with percutaneous re-vascularization, including results of short-and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several small-scaled trials have evaluated the role of percutaneous coronary interventions as a potential treatment mode for allograft CAD [25][26][27][28]. Koyanagi et al [29] describe restenosis rates after cardiovascular interventions in heart transplant patients to be as high as 67%; however, it should be noted that 91.7% of the PTCA were balloon angioplasties without stent implantation.…”
Section: Percutaneous Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include bypass surgery, retransplantation, balloon angioplasty and coronary stenting. Unfortunately, these options are limited to selected cases and the long-term benefits of these interventions are not well established [4,5] . Although the primary procedural success rate of percutaneous revascularization techniques is very high, the restenosis rate in this population is almost 50% [5] and the long-term prognosis remains poor despite an improvement in the diameter of epicardial coronary vessels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%